The Democrats tend to appeal to issues of the head (common-sense legislation) and heart (compassionate immigration, universal health care, civil rights). The Republicans appeal to issues of the gut (safety, security, pocketbook). Out of fear, the gut reigns.
Most Americans seem to be more fearful of losing their country — their “American way of life” — than the Democrats had probably expected. It seems that that fear has trumped, if you will, the hope and possibility of what we could be as a nation. Democrats maybe need to start listening and addressing these issues more effectively.
Harvy Simkovits
Lexington
Working class’s anti-establishment sentiment carried the day
As the Democrats begin to unpack what happened in their loss to Donald Trump Tuesday, I would hope they consider their miscalculation of the depth of anti-establishment feeling among the US working class.
About 60 percent of Americans live paycheck to paycheck. People are angry at the system for their economic pain. The Kamala Harris campaign prioritized moving to the center and reaching out to Republicans in an effort to expand its base. Harris often described herself as “a capitalist” who would reach across the aisle to work with Republicans. There was little focus on the fact that we are living at a time of the greatest income and wealth inequality in this country since the 1920s. There seemed to be a concerted effort to de-emphasize the class divide.
Trump was good at finding an enemy for working folks’ economic woes — namely immigrants. While he’s completely wrong and disingenuous, his demonization of “migrants” worked.
The American people wanted more “I’m going to go after the people who are causing so much pain” rather than “Let’s all work together.” Trump understood that; Harris, not so much.
Philip Fiermonte
Venice, Fla.
The writer retired in 2017 as a longtime aide to US Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont, including as his state director.
Party should take a hard look at its platform and how it picks its candidates
I said this in 2016, after Donald Trump was elected the first time, and it bears repeating: The Democratic Party needs to take a long, hard look at itself and especially at how it picks candidates.
It seems that the Democrats pick people because it’s “their turn.” If that’s why they (successfully) put Joe Biden up in 2020, then, because of his age, it should have been stipulated from the beginning that his would be a one-term presidency.
The Democrats need to take a close look at the party platform and policies and who best represents the party, especially the next generation of leaders.
As I read in a commentary this week, ”it was the economy, stupid.” And it was immigration. The Democrats need to go back to their roots. Theirs was the party of the working people, not the elites. Time to sit at people’s kitchen tables and listen.
Sue Hoy
Taunton
Harris embraced fracking and lost the upper hand on climate fight
Early in Vice President Kamala Harris’s compressed campaign for president, she reversed a position she took as a candidate in 2019 and said she was pro-fracking. While this was an obvious attempt to appeal to the voters of Pennsylvania, a critical swing state, the decision was a strategic mistake of grand proportions because it shut down her ability to run on climate change. Donald Trump was able to freely discuss his plans to leave the Paris agreement, halt advances in renewable energy, and increase fossil fuel use. Harris remained virtually silent with one hand tied behind her back.
Of course, that isn’t the only reason she lost the race, but it was a major contributor.
In another four years the climate crisis will be much worse. There’s a chance — hopefully — that the Democrats will finally wake up, realize the magnitude of the crisis, and start making it a major campaign issue. Aside from its being perhaps the Republicans’ greatest vulnerability, it’s also the only sane thing to do.
Mike Dean
Marshfield
Now there’s work to do and a fight to wage
Like many people who are disappointed in the results of the election, I’m struggling to find motivation for action in the wake of what feels like a crushing defeat. But I just looked again at the list of Project 2025 policies and began to think deeper about how they would hurt my communities and those I love. I think our mission, our goal, should be to stop as many of these policies as possible from becoming a reality. Organize, communicate how they will hurt your loved ones, donate to groups fighting these policies, volunteer with these organizations, do anything.
Tim Cronin
Weymouth