ACRE
Jordan Peterson considering legal action after Trudeau claims he’s funded by Russia
PUBLICADO
2 anos atrásem


And here’s the ultimate shock: Dr. Qiu and Mr. Cheng were not arrested or detained. They were not prosecuted for espionage or national security violations. Instead, under the watchful eye of Justin Trudeau’s government, they were allowed to simply leave.
Imagine for a moment that Canada’s top research lab, handling the most dangerous pathogens in the world—Ebola, Henipah, you name it—was left wide open to foreign actors. Not just any foreign actors, but researchers with direct links to the Chinese Communist Party, its military, and its notorious Thousand Talents Program, which is designed to poach foreign research for China’s own strategic and military gain. It sounds like something out of a bad spy thriller, right? But it’s not fiction; it’s happening in Canada, and no one in Ottawa seemed interested in sounding the alarm.
As detailed in the newly released Interim Report of the Special Committee on the Canada–People’s Republic of China Relationship, titled The Nexus Between Science and National Security in Canada: The Case of the National Microbiology Laboratory in Winnipeg, what we’re seeing is an astonishing lapse in oversight and a clear failure by the Canadian government to protect its own assets. Under the chairmanship of Ken Hardie, this committee has exposed one of the most significant threats to Canada’s national security in recent years. And yet, it’s clear from Ottawa’s inaction that they’re more concerned about diplomacy than defending the integrity of Canada’s scientific research.
Here’s the story: Dr. Xiangguo Qiu and her husband Keding Cheng, both highly placed researchers at Canada’s National Microbiology Laboratory (NML) in Winnipeg, were discovered to have sent live samples of deadly pathogens to the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Yes, you heard that right—the same lab in China where U.S. officials raised concerns about safety standards, the same lab with ties to China’s military bio-defense programs. The duo apparently facilitated the transfer of these dangerous viruses, without ever informing their Canadian superiors of their deep, undisclosed ties to the Chinese Academy of Military Medical Sciences. And instead of acting immediately, Canada’s Public Health Agency dragged its feet for nearly 18 months, leaving these individuals with full access to our country’s most secure lab until they were finally escorted out.
The kicker? Dr. Qiu was not only tied to China’s state-run labs; she was a part of China’s Thousand Talents Program, an initiative infamous for recruiting scientists to advance Chinese military and technological aims abroad. The intelligence community has been ringing the bell on this program for years, pointing out that it’s often used to extract intellectual property and cutting-edge technology from unsuspecting Western institutions. Yet, for years, our own government allowed researchers with links to this very program to operate freely inside our lab, handling the kinds of materials that could cause a pandemic.
So what did Ottawa do in response to all of this? They waited. The government sat on its hands, allowing these researchers to continue their work, their connections to China notwithstanding. When the red flags became impossible to ignore, what did Ottawa do? They spent another year “investigating” before finally revoking their security clearances and escorting them out of the lab. Incredibly, these two were essentially free to operate, with minimal oversight, until they were finally fired. No public condemnation, no mention of betrayal. Just a quiet, bureaucratic exit.
And here’s the ultimate shock: Dr. Qiu and Mr. Cheng were not arrested or detained. They were not prosecuted for espionage or national security violations. Instead, under the watchful eye of Justin Trudeau’s government, they were allowed to simply leave. The RCMP concluded an investigation but chose not to charge them, despite clear evidence of security breaches, undisclosed foreign affiliations, and access to sensitive biological data. Now, these individuals are reportedly back in China, free to use the knowledge they gained at the NML in any way they—or their government—sees fit. This is what happens when national security is treated as an afterthought.
Think about the stakes here. These scientists facilitated the transfer of live, deadly virus samples—Ebola and Henipah, no less—to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, a lab linked to China’s bio-defense ambitions. Had any of these samples been mishandled or compromised during transit, we could have seen an epidemic that would make COVID look like a mild cough. And yet, Ottawa’s response? They let them leave the country, free to take that sensitive information and those deadly pathogens with them.
This isn’t just a case of two rogue scientists. It’s a textbook example of Ottawa’s endless naivety when it comes to China—a government so desperate to avoid rocking the diplomatic boat that it overlooked the most basic principles of national security. And while Canadian leadership dithers, China’s influence operations continue to infiltrate our most secure facilities, capitalizing on our open doors and blind trust. This isn’t about science—it’s about sovereignty. And if Canada’s leaders are too timid to confront the truth about foreign interference, it’s the rest of us who will suffer the consequences.
In any other country, this would have been treated as a scandal of epic proportions. But here in Canada, under Trudeau’s watch, we not only allowed suspected national security threats to operate in a top-level lab, but we gave them the green light to walk away and take their knowledge straight to a foreign power. This report is a wake-up call, but whether Ottawa will finally act to protect Canada’s interests remains to be seen.
The report spells out these security lapses in brutal detail. Not only was cybersecurity alarmingly lax, but access protocols were so outdated that foreign entities had unregulated access to sensitive research and biological materials. This wasn’t just a mishap; this was a failure of leadership on every level, starting at the top. The government’s own Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) had flagged China’s intent to poach scientific research for years. And yet, they ignored that, allowing China, a known aggressor in intellectual property theft, to waltz in and access sensitive data with minimal checks.
Then there’s the espionage risk. It’s clear that China has been targeting Canada’s scientific research for its own military development. This is not speculation; it’s reality. China’s Thousand Talents Program, which the report scrutinizes, is essentially a recruitment and resource-gathering initiative. It encourages Chinese researchers to siphon scientific advancements from abroad and bring them home—not for the betterment of the world, but for China’s military ambitions. The report finally calls this out as a threat, recommending that Canada sever research partnerships with Chinese institutions in high-stakes fields like artificial intelligence, biotechnology, and quantum science.
But here’s the kicker—the recommendations themselves. They make sense, of course. Canada desperately needs to beef up its lab security and stop outsourcing critical research to hostile nations. The report outlines several sensible measures: enhanced security protocols, regular cybersecurity assessments, and yes, a hard stop on partnerships with Chinese research entities in sensitive areas. But what’s troubling is that it took this long and this much incompetence for these ideas to even make it to paper.
Let’s be clear: updating national security policies shouldn’t be a new idea, yet we learn from this report that Canada’s policies haven’t seen a significant update since 2004. Think about that—back then, the world had barely even heard of Facebook. Since then, we’ve entered an era where China has risen as a global tech superpower, yet Ottawa has done next to nothing to adapt. We’re only now beginning to take steps that would have been considered basic precautions a decade ago.
Another recommendation—the establishment of a “List of Trusted Countries”—highlights just how overdue these changes are. The committee suggests that research access should be limited to trusted allies. It’s a painfully obvious measure, but one the government has been too naïve or complacent to enact. We’re talking about limiting sensitive access to allies, not adversaries—a straightforward move that apparently requires a parliamentary committee to remind the government to consider.
So, here’s the good news buried in this report: finally, someone in Ottawa acknowledges that foreign actors, and particularly China, pose a real threat to Canada’s scientific integrity and national security. The recommendations to update policies, bolster security measures, and increase oversight are crucial first steps to protecting Canadian interests. We finally have a report that states the obvious: Canada’s national labs are vulnerable, and it’s about time we stop treating foreign research partners as benign collaborators.
But the real story here isn’t in the recommendations themselves—it’s in what this report reveals about Canada’s persistent, dangerous naivety. The Canadian government allowed this exposure to go on for years, despite clear signs that Chinese actors were exploiting our openness. And the delays! Eighteen months passed between the initial security breach and the firing of these researchers. That delay isn’t just bureaucratic; it’s reckless. The report also conveniently dances around calling China a direct adversary. This soft language is a transparent attempt to avoid upsetting the diplomatic apple cart, even as the Chinese Communist Party plunders Canadian resources right under our noses.
By failing to designate the NML as a facility of national security interest, Ottawa has, in essence, downplayed the real risks tied to foreign interference. This is a lab that deals with viruses capable of sparking pandemics, and yet, our government didn’t even think to prioritize its protection until foreign espionage scandals blew up in public view.
This report is a reality check, but it’s also an indictment. It reveals that Canada’s leaders have been asleep at the wheel while China set its sights on our labs, our technology, and our national interests. Yes, it’s a step forward—but the fact that it took this level of security failure and foreign interference for Ottawa to even begin addressing these issues is a damning testament to their refusal to confront the truth about China.
And here’s the real kicker: nothing in this report guarantees that these recommendations will be enforced. Without the political will to label China as the strategic adversary it is, all of this could end up as little more than lip service. Meanwhile, we had traitors who betrayed Canada, exposing sensitive research to a foreign power—and what did Justin Trudeau do? He let them walk. No charges, no accountability—just a quiet “thanks for coming.” Once again, it will be Canadians—not the bureaucrats in Ottawa—who pay the price for this government’s cowardice.
If Justin Trudeau can’t stand up to China, then it’s time we find a leader who can.
Relacionado
VOCÊ PODE GOSTAR
ACRE
Participe da Autoavaliação do Curso de ciências contábeis — Universidade Federal do Acre
PUBLICADO
9 horas atrásem
20 de agosto de 2026
Olá, estudante!
Este instrumento foi elaborado com o objetivo de ouvir você e conhecer a sua percepção sobre o Curso de Ciências Contábeis. Sua participação é muito importante para que possamos identificar os pontos positivos, as dificuldades e as principais demandas dos estudantes, contribuindo para o processo de avaliação e melhoria contínua do curso.
O questionário aborda diferentes aspectos da sua experiência acadêmica, como disciplinas e organização curricular, metodologias de ensino, atuação dos professores, infraestrutura, biblioteca, laboratórios, acessibilidade, apoio aos estudantes, estágio, pesquisa, extensão, monitoria, iniciação científica, eventos e comunicação com a Coordenação.
As respostas serão utilizadas de forma responsável e, preferencialmente, de maneira agregada, com a finalidade de subsidiar ações e decisões voltadas ao aprimoramento da qualidade do curso e da formação acadêmica e profissional dos estudantes.
🗣️ Este é um espaço para você ser ouvido! Por isso, responda com sinceridade, apresentando sua percepção, críticas, sugestões e demandas. Não existem respostas certas ou erradas: o mais importante é que sua opinião represente verdadeiramente a sua experiência como estudante.
Agradecemos sua participação e contribuição para a construção de um Curso de Ciências Contábeis cada vez melhor, mais inclusivo, acolhedor e alinhado às necessidades dos estudantes e às demandas da sociedade e do mercado profissional.
Sua opinião é fundamental para construirmos juntos o futuro do nosso curso!
Acesse o formulário de Autoavaliação
Relacionado
ACRE
Ufac retoma reuniões presenciais dos conselhos superiores após 6 anos — Universidade Federal do Acre
PUBLICADO
1 dia atrásem
19 de agosto de 2026A Ufac retomou as sessões presenciais dos seus órgãos colegiados após quase seis anos. O retorno foi marcado pela 2ª reunião ordinária do Conselho de Ensino, Pesquisa e Extensão (Cepex) de 2026, a qual ocorreu nesta quarta-feira, 19, no anfiteatro Garibaldi Brasil, campus-sede.
As sessões passaram a ser remotas devido à pandemia da covid-19, em 2020. Depois, foram impactadas por paralisações dos servidores, crise no transporte público de Rio Branco e greve dos estudantes. “É um recomeço e o cumprimento de um dos principais compromissos assumidos durante nossa campanha eleitoral”, disse o reitor Josimar Ferreira. “Este anfiteatro foi arena de grandes lutas do movimento sindical e dos próprios conselhos universitários.”
Segundo o servidor Jairo Nogueira, que atuou na intermediação do encontro com a Reitoria, a volta do formato presencial é fundamental para resgatar a interação direta entre os colegas e destravar os processos acumulados do Cepex. A sessão serviu de preparo para a reunião do Conselho Universitário (Consu), agendada para esta quinta-feira, 20.
Entre as propostas para a sessão do Consu, destacam-se reformulações no organograma da universidade, como a criação da Pró-Reitoria de Ações Afirmativas e Equidade, a reestruturação da Pró-Reitoria de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação, que passará a incorporar ações de inovação e o fortalecimento da autonomia do campus Floresta, em Cruzeiro do Sul, com a criação da figura do diretor do campus e de duas diretorias administrativas de suporte.
Por conta dos custos operacionais para o deslocamento dos 21 conselheiros de Cruzeiro do Sul, o modelo no campus do interior seguirá de forma híbrida temporariamente. A gestão está estruturando uma sala com suporte tecnológico para garantir a transmissão em tempo real, sem prejuízos aos participantes remotos. Paralelamente, nos próximos cem dias, a Reitoria pretende adaptar um espaço definitivo para as reuniões dos órgãos colegiados no campus-sede.
(Fhagner Soares, estagiário Ascom/Ufac)
Relacionado
ACRE
Podcast da Ufac entrevista novo reitor Josimar Ferreira — Universidade Federal do Acre
PUBLICADO
3 dias atrásem
17 de agosto de 2026O canal UfacTV no YouTube transmitiu ao vivo, na quinta-feira, 13, a estreia da terceira temporada do CapiCast, podcast oficial produzido pela Assessoria de Comunicação da universidade. O episódio inaugural trouxe como convidado o professor Josimar Ferreira, que assumiu a Reitoria da instituição para o quadriênio 2026-2030, em uma entrevista conduzida pela apresentadora e assessora de Comunicação Nattércia Damasceno. A solenidade oficial de transmissão de cargo será na sexta-feira, 21, às 17h, no Teatro Universitário.
Com a temática geral “Ufac em Perspectiva: Floresta, Conhecimento, Futuro”, a nova temporada busca debater o papel da universidade na transformação social e no desenvolvimento regional, integrando a produção acadêmica à preservação ambiental e às demandas da comunidade acreana.
Durante a conversa, o novo reitor relembrou sua trajetória acadêmica iniciada em 1997, quando ingressou no curso de Agronomia como filho de produtores rurais e enfrentou os desafios do ensino superior na época, como a escassez de transporte e de bolsas de estudo. “Estar no cargo de reitor me faz refletir isso, porque eu sei de onde vim, como se diz, o chão de fábrica, um filho de um produtor rural que, graças ao processo educacional, chega ao maior posto da sua casa.”
Ao tratar das prioridades para os primeiros cem dias de gestão, Josimar antecipou medidas voltadas à reestruturação de serviços e ao diálogo com a comunidade. O primeiro ato administrativo a ser submetido ao Conselho Universitário (Consu) será a revogação das reuniões virtuais, garantindo o retorno das sessões presenciais dos colegiados.
O plano de ação inicial também inclui a retomada dos serviços de xerox para alunos e docentes, o estudo para implantação de reconhecimento facial nas catracas do Restaurante Universitário e o foco na conclusão de obras pendentes, como a passarela da Medicina Veterinária e as instalações do Colégio de Aplicação.
Outro tema abordado foi o compromisso com a inclusão e a equidade. O gestor anunciou que proporá ao Consu a criação da Pró-Reitoria de Ações Afirmativas e Equidade, estrutura planejada para centralizar e fortalecer as políticas voltadas aos estudantes indígenas, ao Núcleo de Apoio à Inclusão e aos observatórios sociais da instituição.
Por fim, o fortalecimento da comunicação pública foi apontado como peça-chave para romper os muros da academia e levar o conhecimento científico diretamente à sociedade.
(Fhagner Soares, estagiário Ascom/Ufac)
Relacionado
PESQUISE AQUI
MAIS LIDAS
ACRE3 dias agoPodcast da Ufac entrevista novo reitor Josimar Ferreira — Universidade Federal do Acre
ACRE1 dia agoUfac retoma reuniões presenciais dos conselhos superiores após 6 anos — Universidade Federal do Acre
Economia e Negócios13 horas agoEstatística aplicada ao esporte: o que os números realmente medem
ACRE9 horas agoParticipe da Autoavaliação do Curso de ciências contábeis — Universidade Federal do Acre
Warning: Undefined variable $user_ID in /home/u824415267/domains/acre.com.br/public_html/wp-content/themes/zox-news/comments.php on line 48
You must be logged in to post a comment Login