NOSSAS REDES

ACRE

Jordan Peterson considering legal action after Trudeau claims he’s funded by Russia

PUBLICADO

em

The Opposition with Dan Knight

And here’s the ultimate shock: Dr. Qiu and Mr. Cheng were not arrested or detained. They were not prosecuted for espionage or national security violations. Instead, under the watchful eye of Justin Trudeau’s government, they were allowed to simply leave.

Imagine for a moment that Canada’s top research lab, handling the most dangerous pathogens in the world—Ebola, Henipah, you name it—was left wide open to foreign actors. Not just any foreign actors, but researchers with direct links to the Chinese Communist Party, its military, and its notorious Thousand Talents Program, which is designed to poach foreign research for China’s own strategic and military gain. It sounds like something out of a bad spy thriller, right? But it’s not fiction; it’s happening in Canada, and no one in Ottawa seemed interested in sounding the alarm.

As detailed in the newly released Interim Report of the Special Committee on the Canada–People’s Republic of China Relationship, titled The Nexus Between Science and National Security in Canada: The Case of the National Microbiology Laboratory in Winnipeg, what we’re seeing is an astonishing lapse in oversight and a clear failure by the Canadian government to protect its own assets. Under the chairmanship of Ken Hardie, this committee has exposed one of the most significant threats to Canada’s national security in recent years. And yet, it’s clear from Ottawa’s inaction that they’re more concerned about diplomacy than defending the integrity of Canada’s scientific research.

Here’s the story: Dr. Xiangguo Qiu and her husband Keding Cheng, both highly placed researchers at Canada’s National Microbiology Laboratory (NML) in Winnipeg, were discovered to have sent live samples of deadly pathogens to the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Yes, you heard that right—the same lab in China where U.S. officials raised concerns about safety standards, the same lab with ties to China’s military bio-defense programs. The duo apparently facilitated the transfer of these dangerous viruses, without ever informing their Canadian superiors of their deep, undisclosed ties to the Chinese Academy of Military Medical Sciences. And instead of acting immediately, Canada’s Public Health Agency dragged its feet for nearly 18 months, leaving these individuals with full access to our country’s most secure lab until they were finally escorted out.

The kicker? Dr. Qiu was not only tied to China’s state-run labs; she was a part of China’s Thousand Talents Program, an initiative infamous for recruiting scientists to advance Chinese military and technological aims abroad. The intelligence community has been ringing the bell on this program for years, pointing out that it’s often used to extract intellectual property and cutting-edge technology from unsuspecting Western institutions. Yet, for years, our own government allowed researchers with links to this very program to operate freely inside our lab, handling the kinds of materials that could cause a pandemic.

So what did Ottawa do in response to all of this? They waited. The government sat on its hands, allowing these researchers to continue their work, their connections to China notwithstanding. When the red flags became impossible to ignore, what did Ottawa do? They spent another year “investigating” before finally revoking their security clearances and escorting them out of the lab. Incredibly, these two were essentially free to operate, with minimal oversight, until they were finally fired. No public condemnation, no mention of betrayal. Just a quiet, bureaucratic exit.

And here’s the ultimate shock: Dr. Qiu and Mr. Cheng were not arrested or detained. They were not prosecuted for espionage or national security violations. Instead, under the watchful eye of Justin Trudeau’s government, they were allowed to simply leave. The RCMP concluded an investigation but chose not to charge them, despite clear evidence of security breaches, undisclosed foreign affiliations, and access to sensitive biological data. Now, these individuals are reportedly back in China, free to use the knowledge they gained at the NML in any way they—or their government—sees fit. This is what happens when national security is treated as an afterthought.

Think about the stakes here. These scientists facilitated the transfer of live, deadly virus samples—Ebola and Henipah, no less—to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, a lab linked to China’s bio-defense ambitions. Had any of these samples been mishandled or compromised during transit, we could have seen an epidemic that would make COVID look like a mild cough. And yet, Ottawa’s response? They let them leave the country, free to take that sensitive information and those deadly pathogens with them.

This isn’t just a case of two rogue scientists. It’s a textbook example of Ottawa’s endless naivety when it comes to China—a government so desperate to avoid rocking the diplomatic boat that it overlooked the most basic principles of national security. And while Canadian leadership dithers, China’s influence operations continue to infiltrate our most secure facilities, capitalizing on our open doors and blind trust. This isn’t about science—it’s about sovereignty. And if Canada’s leaders are too timid to confront the truth about foreign interference, it’s the rest of us who will suffer the consequences.

In any other country, this would have been treated as a scandal of epic proportions. But here in Canada, under Trudeau’s watch, we not only allowed suspected national security threats to operate in a top-level lab, but we gave them the green light to walk away and take their knowledge straight to a foreign power. This report is a wake-up call, but whether Ottawa will finally act to protect Canada’s interests remains to be seen.

The report spells out these security lapses in brutal detail. Not only was cybersecurity alarmingly lax, but access protocols were so outdated that foreign entities had unregulated access to sensitive research and biological materials. This wasn’t just a mishap; this was a failure of leadership on every level, starting at the top. The government’s own Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) had flagged China’s intent to poach scientific research for years. And yet, they ignored that, allowing China, a known aggressor in intellectual property theft, to waltz in and access sensitive data with minimal checks.

Then there’s the espionage risk. It’s clear that China has been targeting Canada’s scientific research for its own military development. This is not speculation; it’s reality. China’s Thousand Talents Program, which the report scrutinizes, is essentially a recruitment and resource-gathering initiative. It encourages Chinese researchers to siphon scientific advancements from abroad and bring them home—not for the betterment of the world, but for China’s military ambitions. The report finally calls this out as a threat, recommending that Canada sever research partnerships with Chinese institutions in high-stakes fields like artificial intelligence, biotechnology, and quantum science.

But here’s the kicker—the recommendations themselves. They make sense, of course. Canada desperately needs to beef up its lab security and stop outsourcing critical research to hostile nations. The report outlines several sensible measures: enhanced security protocols, regular cybersecurity assessments, and yes, a hard stop on partnerships with Chinese research entities in sensitive areas. But what’s troubling is that it took this long and this much incompetence for these ideas to even make it to paper.

Let’s be clear: updating national security policies shouldn’t be a new idea, yet we learn from this report that Canada’s policies haven’t seen a significant update since 2004. Think about that—back then, the world had barely even heard of Facebook. Since then, we’ve entered an era where China has risen as a global tech superpower, yet Ottawa has done next to nothing to adapt. We’re only now beginning to take steps that would have been considered basic precautions a decade ago.

Another recommendation—the establishment of a “List of Trusted Countries”—highlights just how overdue these changes are. The committee suggests that research access should be limited to trusted allies. It’s a painfully obvious measure, but one the government has been too naïve or complacent to enact. We’re talking about limiting sensitive access to allies, not adversaries—a straightforward move that apparently requires a parliamentary committee to remind the government to consider.

So, here’s the good news buried in this report: finally, someone in Ottawa acknowledges that foreign actors, and particularly China, pose a real threat to Canada’s scientific integrity and national security. The recommendations to update policies, bolster security measures, and increase oversight are crucial first steps to protecting Canadian interests. We finally have a report that states the obvious: Canada’s national labs are vulnerable, and it’s about time we stop treating foreign research partners as benign collaborators.

But the real story here isn’t in the recommendations themselves—it’s in what this report reveals about Canada’s persistent, dangerous naivety. The Canadian government allowed this exposure to go on for years, despite clear signs that Chinese actors were exploiting our openness. And the delays! Eighteen months passed between the initial security breach and the firing of these researchers. That delay isn’t just bureaucratic; it’s reckless. The report also conveniently dances around calling China a direct adversary. This soft language is a transparent attempt to avoid upsetting the diplomatic apple cart, even as the Chinese Communist Party plunders Canadian resources right under our noses.

By failing to designate the NML as a facility of national security interest, Ottawa has, in essence, downplayed the real risks tied to foreign interference. This is a lab that deals with viruses capable of sparking pandemics, and yet, our government didn’t even think to prioritize its protection until foreign espionage scandals blew up in public view.

This report is a reality check, but it’s also an indictment. It reveals that Canada’s leaders have been asleep at the wheel while China set its sights on our labs, our technology, and our national interests. Yes, it’s a step forward—but the fact that it took this level of security failure and foreign interference for Ottawa to even begin addressing these issues is a damning testament to their refusal to confront the truth about China.

And here’s the real kicker: nothing in this report guarantees that these recommendations will be enforced. Without the political will to label China as the strategic adversary it is, all of this could end up as little more than lip service. Meanwhile, we had traitors who betrayed Canada, exposing sensitive research to a foreign power—and what did Justin Trudeau do? He let them walk. No charges, no accountability—just a quiet “thanks for coming.” Once again, it will be Canadians—not the bureaucrats in Ottawa—who pay the price for this government’s cowardice.

If Justin Trudeau can’t stand up to China, then it’s time we find a leader who can.

Leia Mais

Advertisement
Comentários

Warning: Undefined variable $user_ID in /home/u824415267/domains/acre.com.br/public_html/wp-content/themes/zox-news/comments.php on line 48

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Comente aqui

ACRE

Ufac e SEE discutem disponibilização de produtos educacionais para professores da rede estadual — Universidade Federal do Acre

PUBLICADO

em

Ufac e SEE discutem disponibilização de produtos educacionais para professores da rede estadual — Universidade Federal do Acre

A Universidade Federal do Acre (Ufac), por meio do Mestrado Profissional em Ensino de Ciências e Matemática (MPECIM), reuniu-se com representantes da Secretaria de Estado de Educação do Acre (SEE) na manhã desta terça-feira, 13, para discutir possibilidades de parceria para disponibilizar produtos educacionais desenvolvidos no programa de pós-graduação aos professores da rede estadual de ensino. O encontro ocorreu na sede da secretaria.

A proposta busca ampliar o acesso dos professores aos materiais produzidos no âmbito do MPECIM, contribuindo para o fortalecimento das práticas pedagógicas e da formação continuada dos docentes.

Participaram da reunião o coordenador do MPECIM, Pierre André Garcia Pires; a secretária adjunta de Ensino, Gleicicleia Gonçalves de Souza; e a assessora técnico-pedagógica da Diretoria de Ensino, Fabiany Soares Mamed.

O encontro permitiu discutir possibilidades de cooperação entre as instituições para viabilizar o acesso dos professores da rede estadual aos produtos educacionais desenvolvidos pela universidade



Leia Mais: UFAC

Continue lendo

ACRE

Ufac inaugura núcleo de apoio administrativo às coordenações de curso — Universidade Federal do Acre

PUBLICADO

em

Ufac inaugura núcleo de apoio administrativo às coordenações de curso — Universidade Federal do Acre

A Universidade Federal do Acre (Ufac) inaugurou, na manhã desta terça-feira, 13, o Núcleo Integrado de Apoio às Coordenações (NIAC), instalado na Pró-Reitoria de Graduação (Prograd). A iniciativa tem como objetivo oferecer suporte administrativo aos cursos de graduação, neste momento com atendimento prioritário a oito coordenações que estão sem servidores técnico-administrativos. A proposta prevê também o desenvolvimento de outras ações de apoio às coordenações no âmbito do núcleo. A solenidade contou com a participação do reitor Josimar Ferreira, da vice-reitora Almecina Balbino, da pró-reitora de Graduação, Danila Torres, e da pró-reitora de Desenvolvimento e Gestão de Pessoas substituta, Juliana Queirós.

O reitor destacou a importância da iniciativa para o funcionamento dos cursos e reconheceu a colaboração dos servidores envolvidos. “Quero parabenizar toda a equipe da Prograd, reconhecer o voluntariado dos nossos secretários de curso e o apoio das coordenações”, afirmou Josimar. Segundo ele, o serviço dará suporte especialmente às coordenações que estão sem secretários, mas também poderá atender aos demais coordenadores de curso.

A criação do NIAC é uma iniciativa da Prograd e da Pró-Reitoria de Desenvolvimento e Gestão de Pessoas (Prodgep), que contou também com a participação inicial do Núcleo de Registro e Controle Acadêmico (Nurca). O espaço foi organizado nas instalações da Prograd para facilitar o acompanhamento das atividades e o apoio aos servidores.

Segundo a pró-reitora Danila Torres, a proposta surgiu da necessidade de atender coordenações que enfrentam dificuldades na execução das atividades administrativas. Algumas delas estão há mais de oito meses sem servidores técnicos, deixando os coordenadores responsáveis também pelas rotinas administrativas. “A gente vai tentar apoiar as coordenações naquilo que elas precisam”, explicou.

O núcleo funciona por meio de uma escala de revezamento de servidores técnico-administrativos de outras coordenações. Atualmente, sete profissionais participam voluntariamente da iniciativa, com autorização das chefias imediatas, dedicando dois dias por semana ao atendimento compartilhado, sem deixar suas atividades nas unidades de origem.

A meta é ampliar a equipe para dez servidores, permitindo a presença de dois profissionais no turno da manhã e dois à tarde. “O serviço deles é padrão, é comum, então não tem um técnico para uma coordenação. Todos trabalham em todas essas oito coordenações”, explicou Danila.

Entre as primeiras demandas do NIAC está o lançamento das ofertas de disciplinas do semestre letivo 2026.2 no sistema acadêmico, considerando o início das solicitações de matrícula pelos estudantes nesta quinta-feira, 15. A medida busca assegurar o andamento dos procedimentos acadêmicos nas coordenações que não dispõem de técnicos para executar essas atividades.

Além do atendimento inicial às oito coordenações, a proposta é ampliar gradualmente a atuação do núcleo para oferecer suporte às demais unidades acadêmicas, incluindo o auxílio a novos coordenadores nas rotinas administrativas dos cursos e o desenvolvimento de outras ações de apoio às coordenações.



Leia Mais: UFAC

Continue lendo

ACRE

Alunas da Ufac criam biblioteca de grafismos do povo Huni Kuin — Universidade Federal do Acre

PUBLICADO

em

Alexandra Deitos e Txima Huni Kuin.jpg

Alunas de graduação e mestrado do campus Floresta da Ufac criaram, em 2024, o projeto Biblioteca de Kene, que reúne tecelagem em algodão, pintura corporal, registros audiovisuais e uma plataforma digital acessível por celular. A iniciativa surgiu do trabalho de conclusão de curso de Txima Huni Kuin, em Licenciatura Indígena, e da pesquisa para a dissertação de Alexandra Deitos no programa de pós-graduação em Ensino de Humanidades e Linguagens.

Txima investigou a tecelagem como expressão dos conhecimentos, da arte e da espiritualidade de seu povo, sob orientação do professor Amilton Pelegrino de Mattos. Alexandra, artista visual e atualmente doutoranda, colaborou na construção do projeto por meio de uma pesquisa de autoria coletiva, desenvolvida com as mulheres da comunidade.

Desse encontro surgiu a proposta de criar um espaço onde os mais de 60 grafismos praticados pelas mulheres pudessem ser consultados, ensinados e aprendidos por jovens e mestras tecelãs. O projeto terá uma nova etapa entre 10 e 16 de outubro, com a realização da 2ª Oficina de Kene da Aldeia Arco-Íris, na terra indígena Seringal Independência, no município de Jordão (AC).

Aprendizagem no território

Durante os sete dias de oficina, mestras tecelãs e jovens aprendizes participarão de atividades de preparação de fios, cantos rituais, aplicação do Bawe e tecelagem de painéis com grafismos. Os processos serão documentados para compor o acervo da biblioteca na aldeia e seu site colaborativo, com gestão do conhecimento pelas próprias mulheres.

A proposta dialoga com a expressão “a universidade é na aldeia”, do professor e pesquisador Yube Huni Kuin, também acadêmico da Licenciatura Indígena da Ufac. A experiência reconhece o território e as práticas da comunidade como espaços de produção e transmissão de conhecimento.

Mestras e aprendizes tecelãs.jpg

A 2ª Oficina de Kene é realizada por Txima Huni Kuin, Alexandra Deitos e pela Aldeia Arco-Íris, com apoio do curso de Licenciatura Indígena, da Fundação de Cultura Elias Mansour, do governo do Acre, da Política Nacional Aldir Blanc de Fomento à Cultura, do Ministério da Cultura e do governo federal.

//www.instagram.com/embed.js



Leia Mais: UFAC

Continue lendo

MAIS LIDAS