NOSSAS REDES

ACRE

Jordan Peterson considering legal action after Trudeau claims he’s funded by Russia

PUBLICADO

em

The Opposition with Dan Knight

And here’s the ultimate shock: Dr. Qiu and Mr. Cheng were not arrested or detained. They were not prosecuted for espionage or national security violations. Instead, under the watchful eye of Justin Trudeau’s government, they were allowed to simply leave.

Imagine for a moment that Canada’s top research lab, handling the most dangerous pathogens in the world—Ebola, Henipah, you name it—was left wide open to foreign actors. Not just any foreign actors, but researchers with direct links to the Chinese Communist Party, its military, and its notorious Thousand Talents Program, which is designed to poach foreign research for China’s own strategic and military gain. It sounds like something out of a bad spy thriller, right? But it’s not fiction; it’s happening in Canada, and no one in Ottawa seemed interested in sounding the alarm.

As detailed in the newly released Interim Report of the Special Committee on the Canada–People’s Republic of China Relationship, titled The Nexus Between Science and National Security in Canada: The Case of the National Microbiology Laboratory in Winnipeg, what we’re seeing is an astonishing lapse in oversight and a clear failure by the Canadian government to protect its own assets. Under the chairmanship of Ken Hardie, this committee has exposed one of the most significant threats to Canada’s national security in recent years. And yet, it’s clear from Ottawa’s inaction that they’re more concerned about diplomacy than defending the integrity of Canada’s scientific research.

Here’s the story: Dr. Xiangguo Qiu and her husband Keding Cheng, both highly placed researchers at Canada’s National Microbiology Laboratory (NML) in Winnipeg, were discovered to have sent live samples of deadly pathogens to the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Yes, you heard that right—the same lab in China where U.S. officials raised concerns about safety standards, the same lab with ties to China’s military bio-defense programs. The duo apparently facilitated the transfer of these dangerous viruses, without ever informing their Canadian superiors of their deep, undisclosed ties to the Chinese Academy of Military Medical Sciences. And instead of acting immediately, Canada’s Public Health Agency dragged its feet for nearly 18 months, leaving these individuals with full access to our country’s most secure lab until they were finally escorted out.

The kicker? Dr. Qiu was not only tied to China’s state-run labs; she was a part of China’s Thousand Talents Program, an initiative infamous for recruiting scientists to advance Chinese military and technological aims abroad. The intelligence community has been ringing the bell on this program for years, pointing out that it’s often used to extract intellectual property and cutting-edge technology from unsuspecting Western institutions. Yet, for years, our own government allowed researchers with links to this very program to operate freely inside our lab, handling the kinds of materials that could cause a pandemic.

So what did Ottawa do in response to all of this? They waited. The government sat on its hands, allowing these researchers to continue their work, their connections to China notwithstanding. When the red flags became impossible to ignore, what did Ottawa do? They spent another year “investigating” before finally revoking their security clearances and escorting them out of the lab. Incredibly, these two were essentially free to operate, with minimal oversight, until they were finally fired. No public condemnation, no mention of betrayal. Just a quiet, bureaucratic exit.

And here’s the ultimate shock: Dr. Qiu and Mr. Cheng were not arrested or detained. They were not prosecuted for espionage or national security violations. Instead, under the watchful eye of Justin Trudeau’s government, they were allowed to simply leave. The RCMP concluded an investigation but chose not to charge them, despite clear evidence of security breaches, undisclosed foreign affiliations, and access to sensitive biological data. Now, these individuals are reportedly back in China, free to use the knowledge they gained at the NML in any way they—or their government—sees fit. This is what happens when national security is treated as an afterthought.

Think about the stakes here. These scientists facilitated the transfer of live, deadly virus samples—Ebola and Henipah, no less—to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, a lab linked to China’s bio-defense ambitions. Had any of these samples been mishandled or compromised during transit, we could have seen an epidemic that would make COVID look like a mild cough. And yet, Ottawa’s response? They let them leave the country, free to take that sensitive information and those deadly pathogens with them.

This isn’t just a case of two rogue scientists. It’s a textbook example of Ottawa’s endless naivety when it comes to China—a government so desperate to avoid rocking the diplomatic boat that it overlooked the most basic principles of national security. And while Canadian leadership dithers, China’s influence operations continue to infiltrate our most secure facilities, capitalizing on our open doors and blind trust. This isn’t about science—it’s about sovereignty. And if Canada’s leaders are too timid to confront the truth about foreign interference, it’s the rest of us who will suffer the consequences.

In any other country, this would have been treated as a scandal of epic proportions. But here in Canada, under Trudeau’s watch, we not only allowed suspected national security threats to operate in a top-level lab, but we gave them the green light to walk away and take their knowledge straight to a foreign power. This report is a wake-up call, but whether Ottawa will finally act to protect Canada’s interests remains to be seen.

The report spells out these security lapses in brutal detail. Not only was cybersecurity alarmingly lax, but access protocols were so outdated that foreign entities had unregulated access to sensitive research and biological materials. This wasn’t just a mishap; this was a failure of leadership on every level, starting at the top. The government’s own Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) had flagged China’s intent to poach scientific research for years. And yet, they ignored that, allowing China, a known aggressor in intellectual property theft, to waltz in and access sensitive data with minimal checks.

Then there’s the espionage risk. It’s clear that China has been targeting Canada’s scientific research for its own military development. This is not speculation; it’s reality. China’s Thousand Talents Program, which the report scrutinizes, is essentially a recruitment and resource-gathering initiative. It encourages Chinese researchers to siphon scientific advancements from abroad and bring them home—not for the betterment of the world, but for China’s military ambitions. The report finally calls this out as a threat, recommending that Canada sever research partnerships with Chinese institutions in high-stakes fields like artificial intelligence, biotechnology, and quantum science.

But here’s the kicker—the recommendations themselves. They make sense, of course. Canada desperately needs to beef up its lab security and stop outsourcing critical research to hostile nations. The report outlines several sensible measures: enhanced security protocols, regular cybersecurity assessments, and yes, a hard stop on partnerships with Chinese research entities in sensitive areas. But what’s troubling is that it took this long and this much incompetence for these ideas to even make it to paper.

Let’s be clear: updating national security policies shouldn’t be a new idea, yet we learn from this report that Canada’s policies haven’t seen a significant update since 2004. Think about that—back then, the world had barely even heard of Facebook. Since then, we’ve entered an era where China has risen as a global tech superpower, yet Ottawa has done next to nothing to adapt. We’re only now beginning to take steps that would have been considered basic precautions a decade ago.

Another recommendation—the establishment of a “List of Trusted Countries”—highlights just how overdue these changes are. The committee suggests that research access should be limited to trusted allies. It’s a painfully obvious measure, but one the government has been too naïve or complacent to enact. We’re talking about limiting sensitive access to allies, not adversaries—a straightforward move that apparently requires a parliamentary committee to remind the government to consider.

So, here’s the good news buried in this report: finally, someone in Ottawa acknowledges that foreign actors, and particularly China, pose a real threat to Canada’s scientific integrity and national security. The recommendations to update policies, bolster security measures, and increase oversight are crucial first steps to protecting Canadian interests. We finally have a report that states the obvious: Canada’s national labs are vulnerable, and it’s about time we stop treating foreign research partners as benign collaborators.

But the real story here isn’t in the recommendations themselves—it’s in what this report reveals about Canada’s persistent, dangerous naivety. The Canadian government allowed this exposure to go on for years, despite clear signs that Chinese actors were exploiting our openness. And the delays! Eighteen months passed between the initial security breach and the firing of these researchers. That delay isn’t just bureaucratic; it’s reckless. The report also conveniently dances around calling China a direct adversary. This soft language is a transparent attempt to avoid upsetting the diplomatic apple cart, even as the Chinese Communist Party plunders Canadian resources right under our noses.

By failing to designate the NML as a facility of national security interest, Ottawa has, in essence, downplayed the real risks tied to foreign interference. This is a lab that deals with viruses capable of sparking pandemics, and yet, our government didn’t even think to prioritize its protection until foreign espionage scandals blew up in public view.

This report is a reality check, but it’s also an indictment. It reveals that Canada’s leaders have been asleep at the wheel while China set its sights on our labs, our technology, and our national interests. Yes, it’s a step forward—but the fact that it took this level of security failure and foreign interference for Ottawa to even begin addressing these issues is a damning testament to their refusal to confront the truth about China.

And here’s the real kicker: nothing in this report guarantees that these recommendations will be enforced. Without the political will to label China as the strategic adversary it is, all of this could end up as little more than lip service. Meanwhile, we had traitors who betrayed Canada, exposing sensitive research to a foreign power—and what did Justin Trudeau do? He let them walk. No charges, no accountability—just a quiet “thanks for coming.” Once again, it will be Canadians—not the bureaucrats in Ottawa—who pay the price for this government’s cowardice.

If Justin Trudeau can’t stand up to China, then it’s time we find a leader who can.

Leia Mais

Advertisement
Comentários

Warning: Undefined variable $user_ID in /home/u824415267/domains/acre.com.br/public_html/wp-content/themes/zox-news/comments.php on line 48

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Comente aqui

ACRE

Egressa de mestrado em CZS obtém prêmio de pós-graduação — Universidade Federal do Acre

PUBLICADO

em

Mirian Soares de Amorim.jpeg

A engenheira agrônoma Mirian Soares de Amorim, aluna egressa do curso de Agronomia e do mestrado em Ciências Ambientais, do campus Floresta da Ufac, em Cruzeiro do Sul, obteve o 2º lugar na categoria Pós-Graduação do 5º Prêmio Margarida Alves de Estudos sobre Ruralidades e Feminismos, cujo resultado final foi divulgado em 17 de março. O evento foi promovido pelo Ministério do Desenvolvimento Agrário e Agricultura Familiar.

O estudo destaca a articulação entre a transição agroecológica e a igualdade de gênero, enfatizando o papel central das mulheres rurais, ribeirinhas e agricultoras na preservação da agrobiodiversidade e na soberania alimentar na Amazônia. No mestrado, sob orientação do professor Kleber Andolfato de Oliveira, Mirian também aprofundou investigações sobre o desenvolvimento sustentável e o papel das populações rurais no manejo dos ecossistemas amazônicos.



Leia Mais: UFAC

Continue lendo

ACRE

Ufac consolida criação do curso de Farmácia com 50 vagas — Universidade Federal do Acre

PUBLICADO

em

Curso de Farmácia-entrega de Menção Honrosa (2).jpg

O reitor da Ufac, Josimar Ferreira, reuniu-se com membros da comissão responsável pela proposta de criação do curso de Farmácia. O encontro ocorreu nesta segunda-feira, 31, na sala de reuniões da Reitoria, visando consolidar o Projeto Político-Pedagógico da nova graduação, além de homenagear, com a entrega, pela Federação Nacional dos Farmacêuticos (Fenafar), de Menção Honrosa ao reitor e a pessoas cujo empenho culminou na abertura do curso.

A iniciativa faz parte do programa Universidades Transformadoras, pactuada com o Ministério da Educação (MEC). O curso prevê a oferta de 50 vagas para estudantes e liberação de 11 códigos de vagas para professores. A aula inaugural e início das atividades acadêmicas estão previstos entre 2028 e 2029.

“Esse é um curso que se assenta fortemente na demanda de conhecer os bioativos da floresta amazônica e transformar esse conhecimento em riqueza, patentes, inovação e qualidade de vida para a sociedade”, disse Josimar Ferreira. Além disso, ele ressaltou a necessidade de conectar o novo curso às estruturas já consolidadas da Ufac, otimizando disciplinas e espaços curriculares em conjunto com as áreas de saúde e química.

A presidente da comissão de criação do curso, Andréia Andrade, lembrou que o projeto começou em 2011. “Hoje nos reunimos com a perspectiva de viabilizar a abertura do curso diante do que já temos na instituição. Nosso objetivo é ofertar uma formação generalista, com investimento otimizado na estrutura existente e com forte inserção na pesquisa e extensão, aproveitando a nossa biodiversidade e criando caminho para futuros programas de pós-graduação.”

Também participaram da reunião representantes externos da categoria profissional, como a ex-conselheira federal, membro da comissão e diretora de Relações Institucionais da Fenafar, Isabela de Oliveira Sobrinho. “Acompanhei a busca por esse projeto pedagógico desde o início e ver essa etapa final é um avanço enorme”, pontuou. “É um trabalho a muitas mãos para trazer o melhor para a Ufac. Trata-se de um curso de grande magnitude, focado em tecnologias de medicamentos e em pesquisas com nossas plantas nativas para gerar qualidade de vida à população.”

(Fhagner Soares, estagiário Ascom/Ufac)



Leia Mais: UFAC

Continue lendo

ACRE

Seminário na Ufac debate formação em enfermagem obstétrica — Universidade Federal do Acre

PUBLICADO

em

Seminário enfermagem obstétrica (2).jpg

A Ufac sediou o seminário Desafios Atuais na Formação para a Prática da Enfermagem Obstétrica, que ocorreu nesta sexta-feira, 28, na sala dos Colegiados, campus-sede. O encontro reuniu professores, pesquisadores, gestores e profissionais de saúde para debater a reestruturação do modelo de assistência ao parto e ao nascimento, o fortalecimento do Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS) e a interiorização da qualificação profissional no Estado.

O evento integra um projeto nacional, composto por uma rede de 40 instituições de ensino superior articuladas para formar mais de 700 enfermeiras obstétricas pelo país, com foco prioritário nas regiões do interior. No Acre, o programa abrange turmas de especialização e residência voltadas para profissionais atuantes nas regionais do Alto Acre, Alto Purus, Baixo Acre, Tarauacá-Envira e Juruá.

“A Ufac cumpre o seu papel social ao ampliar a formação e capacitar profissionais que atuam em um momento tão ímpar quanto o nascimento de uma criança”, disse o reitor Josimar Ferreira. “Contamos com alunos de todas as regionais. Isso gera um efeito multiplicador: o profissional capacitado coordena equipes locais e eleva diretamente a qualidade do atendimento prestado à população pelo SUS.”

A coordenadora das formações no Estado e professora da Ufac, Sheley Borges, destacou a necessidade de repensar a prática profissional para garantir um cuidado humanizado e seguro. “A intencionalidade da nossa formação é reduzir a mortalidade materna e neonatal e alcançar as mulheres em uma dimensão em que sejam respeitadas. Queremos garantir que as escolhas não ocorram por medo, como optar por uma cesariana sem compreender que é uma cirurgia de grande porte.”

A coordenadora nacional do curso de especialização em Enfermagem Obstétrica da Rede Alyne, vinculada à Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Kleyde Ventura, ressaltou a relevância estratégica da parceria com a Ufac. “No Acre, vivemos uma condição muito especial, pois, com exceção de uma aluna, todas as especializadas são do interior. Estamos interiorizando e descentralizando os modos de formar, abordando o trabalho multiprofissional e a articulação de redes para garantir assistência de qualidade e direitos assegurados.”

Também participaram do seminário o promotor de Justiça do MP-AC, Gláucio Oshiro; o coordenador do curso de Enfermagem da Ufac, João Francalino; e o epidemiologista Serafim Salgado, coordenador das metodologias aplicadas no programa de formação.

(Fhagner Soares, estagiário Ascom/Ufac)



Leia Mais: UFAC

Continue lendo

MAIS LIDAS