ACRE
Jordan Peterson considering legal action after Trudeau claims he’s funded by Russia
PUBLICADO
2 anos atrásem


And here’s the ultimate shock: Dr. Qiu and Mr. Cheng were not arrested or detained. They were not prosecuted for espionage or national security violations. Instead, under the watchful eye of Justin Trudeau’s government, they were allowed to simply leave.
Imagine for a moment that Canada’s top research lab, handling the most dangerous pathogens in the world—Ebola, Henipah, you name it—was left wide open to foreign actors. Not just any foreign actors, but researchers with direct links to the Chinese Communist Party, its military, and its notorious Thousand Talents Program, which is designed to poach foreign research for China’s own strategic and military gain. It sounds like something out of a bad spy thriller, right? But it’s not fiction; it’s happening in Canada, and no one in Ottawa seemed interested in sounding the alarm.
As detailed in the newly released Interim Report of the Special Committee on the Canada–People’s Republic of China Relationship, titled The Nexus Between Science and National Security in Canada: The Case of the National Microbiology Laboratory in Winnipeg, what we’re seeing is an astonishing lapse in oversight and a clear failure by the Canadian government to protect its own assets. Under the chairmanship of Ken Hardie, this committee has exposed one of the most significant threats to Canada’s national security in recent years. And yet, it’s clear from Ottawa’s inaction that they’re more concerned about diplomacy than defending the integrity of Canada’s scientific research.
Here’s the story: Dr. Xiangguo Qiu and her husband Keding Cheng, both highly placed researchers at Canada’s National Microbiology Laboratory (NML) in Winnipeg, were discovered to have sent live samples of deadly pathogens to the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Yes, you heard that right—the same lab in China where U.S. officials raised concerns about safety standards, the same lab with ties to China’s military bio-defense programs. The duo apparently facilitated the transfer of these dangerous viruses, without ever informing their Canadian superiors of their deep, undisclosed ties to the Chinese Academy of Military Medical Sciences. And instead of acting immediately, Canada’s Public Health Agency dragged its feet for nearly 18 months, leaving these individuals with full access to our country’s most secure lab until they were finally escorted out.
The kicker? Dr. Qiu was not only tied to China’s state-run labs; she was a part of China’s Thousand Talents Program, an initiative infamous for recruiting scientists to advance Chinese military and technological aims abroad. The intelligence community has been ringing the bell on this program for years, pointing out that it’s often used to extract intellectual property and cutting-edge technology from unsuspecting Western institutions. Yet, for years, our own government allowed researchers with links to this very program to operate freely inside our lab, handling the kinds of materials that could cause a pandemic.
So what did Ottawa do in response to all of this? They waited. The government sat on its hands, allowing these researchers to continue their work, their connections to China notwithstanding. When the red flags became impossible to ignore, what did Ottawa do? They spent another year “investigating” before finally revoking their security clearances and escorting them out of the lab. Incredibly, these two were essentially free to operate, with minimal oversight, until they were finally fired. No public condemnation, no mention of betrayal. Just a quiet, bureaucratic exit.
And here’s the ultimate shock: Dr. Qiu and Mr. Cheng were not arrested or detained. They were not prosecuted for espionage or national security violations. Instead, under the watchful eye of Justin Trudeau’s government, they were allowed to simply leave. The RCMP concluded an investigation but chose not to charge them, despite clear evidence of security breaches, undisclosed foreign affiliations, and access to sensitive biological data. Now, these individuals are reportedly back in China, free to use the knowledge they gained at the NML in any way they—or their government—sees fit. This is what happens when national security is treated as an afterthought.
Think about the stakes here. These scientists facilitated the transfer of live, deadly virus samples—Ebola and Henipah, no less—to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, a lab linked to China’s bio-defense ambitions. Had any of these samples been mishandled or compromised during transit, we could have seen an epidemic that would make COVID look like a mild cough. And yet, Ottawa’s response? They let them leave the country, free to take that sensitive information and those deadly pathogens with them.
This isn’t just a case of two rogue scientists. It’s a textbook example of Ottawa’s endless naivety when it comes to China—a government so desperate to avoid rocking the diplomatic boat that it overlooked the most basic principles of national security. And while Canadian leadership dithers, China’s influence operations continue to infiltrate our most secure facilities, capitalizing on our open doors and blind trust. This isn’t about science—it’s about sovereignty. And if Canada’s leaders are too timid to confront the truth about foreign interference, it’s the rest of us who will suffer the consequences.
In any other country, this would have been treated as a scandal of epic proportions. But here in Canada, under Trudeau’s watch, we not only allowed suspected national security threats to operate in a top-level lab, but we gave them the green light to walk away and take their knowledge straight to a foreign power. This report is a wake-up call, but whether Ottawa will finally act to protect Canada’s interests remains to be seen.
The report spells out these security lapses in brutal detail. Not only was cybersecurity alarmingly lax, but access protocols were so outdated that foreign entities had unregulated access to sensitive research and biological materials. This wasn’t just a mishap; this was a failure of leadership on every level, starting at the top. The government’s own Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) had flagged China’s intent to poach scientific research for years. And yet, they ignored that, allowing China, a known aggressor in intellectual property theft, to waltz in and access sensitive data with minimal checks.
Then there’s the espionage risk. It’s clear that China has been targeting Canada’s scientific research for its own military development. This is not speculation; it’s reality. China’s Thousand Talents Program, which the report scrutinizes, is essentially a recruitment and resource-gathering initiative. It encourages Chinese researchers to siphon scientific advancements from abroad and bring them home—not for the betterment of the world, but for China’s military ambitions. The report finally calls this out as a threat, recommending that Canada sever research partnerships with Chinese institutions in high-stakes fields like artificial intelligence, biotechnology, and quantum science.
But here’s the kicker—the recommendations themselves. They make sense, of course. Canada desperately needs to beef up its lab security and stop outsourcing critical research to hostile nations. The report outlines several sensible measures: enhanced security protocols, regular cybersecurity assessments, and yes, a hard stop on partnerships with Chinese research entities in sensitive areas. But what’s troubling is that it took this long and this much incompetence for these ideas to even make it to paper.
Let’s be clear: updating national security policies shouldn’t be a new idea, yet we learn from this report that Canada’s policies haven’t seen a significant update since 2004. Think about that—back then, the world had barely even heard of Facebook. Since then, we’ve entered an era where China has risen as a global tech superpower, yet Ottawa has done next to nothing to adapt. We’re only now beginning to take steps that would have been considered basic precautions a decade ago.
Another recommendation—the establishment of a “List of Trusted Countries”—highlights just how overdue these changes are. The committee suggests that research access should be limited to trusted allies. It’s a painfully obvious measure, but one the government has been too naïve or complacent to enact. We’re talking about limiting sensitive access to allies, not adversaries—a straightforward move that apparently requires a parliamentary committee to remind the government to consider.
So, here’s the good news buried in this report: finally, someone in Ottawa acknowledges that foreign actors, and particularly China, pose a real threat to Canada’s scientific integrity and national security. The recommendations to update policies, bolster security measures, and increase oversight are crucial first steps to protecting Canadian interests. We finally have a report that states the obvious: Canada’s national labs are vulnerable, and it’s about time we stop treating foreign research partners as benign collaborators.
But the real story here isn’t in the recommendations themselves—it’s in what this report reveals about Canada’s persistent, dangerous naivety. The Canadian government allowed this exposure to go on for years, despite clear signs that Chinese actors were exploiting our openness. And the delays! Eighteen months passed between the initial security breach and the firing of these researchers. That delay isn’t just bureaucratic; it’s reckless. The report also conveniently dances around calling China a direct adversary. This soft language is a transparent attempt to avoid upsetting the diplomatic apple cart, even as the Chinese Communist Party plunders Canadian resources right under our noses.
By failing to designate the NML as a facility of national security interest, Ottawa has, in essence, downplayed the real risks tied to foreign interference. This is a lab that deals with viruses capable of sparking pandemics, and yet, our government didn’t even think to prioritize its protection until foreign espionage scandals blew up in public view.
This report is a reality check, but it’s also an indictment. It reveals that Canada’s leaders have been asleep at the wheel while China set its sights on our labs, our technology, and our national interests. Yes, it’s a step forward—but the fact that it took this level of security failure and foreign interference for Ottawa to even begin addressing these issues is a damning testament to their refusal to confront the truth about China.
And here’s the real kicker: nothing in this report guarantees that these recommendations will be enforced. Without the political will to label China as the strategic adversary it is, all of this could end up as little more than lip service. Meanwhile, we had traitors who betrayed Canada, exposing sensitive research to a foreign power—and what did Justin Trudeau do? He let them walk. No charges, no accountability—just a quiet “thanks for coming.” Once again, it will be Canadians—not the bureaucrats in Ottawa—who pay the price for this government’s cowardice.
If Justin Trudeau can’t stand up to China, then it’s time we find a leader who can.
Relacionado
VOCÊ PODE GOSTAR
ACRE
Josimar Ferreira inicia gestão de 4 anos como reitor da Ufac — Universidade Federal do Acre
PUBLICADO
1 dia atrásem
12 de agosto de 2026O reitor da Ufac, Josimar Ferreira, reuniu-se com os novos pró-reitores da administração superior para marcar o início da gestão do quadriênio 2026-2030 e tratar das primeiras ações e prioridades a serem tomadas na universidade. O encontro ocorreu nesta quarta-feira, 12, na Reitoria, campus-sede. A sessão solene pública de transmissão de cargo da Reitoria será realizada na sexta-feira, 21, às 17h, no Teatro Universitário.
Josimar afirmou que a eficiência na aplicação dos recursos e a austeridade estarão entre os princípios da gestão. Hoje ele também se reúne com as equipes das áreas de planejamento e administração para avaliar o orçamento disponível para execução das atividades até o fim do ano. “Esse é um princípio que adotamos desde o primeiro dia”, afirmou.
Entre as primeiras medidas anunciadas está a retomada das reuniões presenciais dos conselhos universitários. Segundo o reitor, a mudança será implementada já nesta primeira semana de gestão.
Outra ação prevista é a criação de uma nova pró-reitoria, voltada a ações afirmativas, equidade, gênero e inclusão. De acordo com Josimar, a proposta é colocar essas políticas no centro da estrutura administrativa da universidade e ampliar sua atuação nas políticas acadêmicas.
A nova gestão também dará continuidade ao processo de realização do vestibular do curso de Medicina. O reitor informou que a Ufac já garantiu recursos e iniciará a fase de contratação da empresa responsável pelo certame. A previsão é que as provas sejam aplicadas nas cinco regionais do Acre, com manutenção do bônus regional.
A interiorização também está entre as prioridades apresentadas. A gestão pretende iniciar discussões sobre a ampliação da presença permanente da universidade no interior, incluindo a regional do Purus, em Sena Madureira, e a região de Tarauacá e Envira.
Josimar destacou ainda a intenção de ampliar a aproximação da Ufac com diferentes setores da sociedade. “Queremos aproximar a relação com a sociedade, com o serviço, com o comércio, com a indústria, e com isso fortalecer o nosso tripé, o ensino, a pesquisa e a extensão.”
Integram a nova administração superior a vice-reitora Almecina Balbino; a pró-reitora de Graduação, Danila Torres; o pró-reitor de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação, Dionatas Meneguetti; o pró-reitor de Extensão e Cultura, Marco Amaro; a pró-reitora de Assuntos Estudantis, Aline Nicolli; o pró-reitor de Planejamento, Edcarlos Souza; o pró-reitor de Desenvolvimento e Gestão de Pessoas, Thiago Lima; e o pró-reitor de Administração, Tone Roca.
Relacionado
ACRE
Proaes lança plataforma para cadastro da assistência estudantil — Universidade Federal do Acre
PUBLICADO
1 dia atrásem
12 de agosto de 2026A Pró-Reitoria de Assuntos Estudantis (Proaes), da Ufac, oficializou o lançamento do Cadastro da Assistência Estudantil (Caes) nessa terça-feira, 11. A nova plataforma digital foi desenvolvida para reformular o processo de seleção de bolsas e auxílios financeiros da instituição, com o objetivo de reduzir a burocracia, otimizar o fluxo socioeconômico e ampliar o acesso dos acadêmicos aos programas de permanência universitária.
A plataforma já está disponível para acesso e o preenchimento do cadastro poderá ser realizado ao longo do ano de 2026. A transição completa do fluxo de seleção para o novo ambiente digital será concluída para ter validade nos editais previstos para o ano letivo de 2027.
O sistema apresenta interface que se adapta, permitindo o preenchimento e acompanhamento das etapas diretamente por dispositivos móveis, como celulares e tablets. Outra mudança estrutural do Caes é a otimização do formulário socioeconômico, que teve sua extensão reduzida de 14 para 9 páginas. O documento passa a ser pré-preenchido de forma automática com dados cadastrais já existentes nas bases de dados integradas da Ufac, evitando a inserção repetitiva de informações pessoais pelos discentes.
O modelo operacional introduz a aprovação prévia do cadastro socioeconômico, que terá validade mínima de dois anos. Com a homologação efetuada pela equipe de assistentes sociais da Proaes, o estudante integrará um banco de dados unificado, ficando apto a diferentes modalidades de auxílios e bolsas por meio de uma manifestação de interesse digital, sem a necessidade de reapresentar a documentação completa a cada novo edital lançado. Apenas modalidades específicas que demandem comprovações complementares, como o auxílio-creche, exigirão anexos pontuais.
O desenvolvimento da ferramenta durou aproximadamente dez meses e foi viabilizado por uma cooperação técnica entre a Proaes, o projeto WebAcademy, sob coordenação do professor Daricélio Moreira, o Núcleo de Tecnologia da Informação e o corpo de assistentes sociais da universidade, que atuaram na especificação das regras de negócio do software. Três acadêmicos selecionados via edital atuaram diretamente na programação e construção do sistema.
“O Cadastro da Assistência Estudantil vai trazer uma redução na burocracia e a possibilidade de melhorar o acesso dos estudantes aos benefícios da Proaes”, disse o pró-reitor de Assuntos Estudantis, Isaac Dayan. “Temos vários aspectos que ajudam o estudante a ter uma melhor experiência na hora de concorrer, como uma interface intuitiva e a redução da quantidade de páginas do formulário. Acreditamos que será um grande avanço na política de assistência estudantil.”
(Fhagner Soares, estagiário Ascom/Ufac)
Relacionado
ACRE
Brinquedoteca da Ufac oferece atividades lúdico-pedagógicas — Universidade Federal do Acre
PUBLICADO
3 dias atrásem
10 de agosto de 2026A Brinquedoteca da Ufac, inaugurada em 11 de fevereiro de 2016, localizada no Bloco Multidisciplinar, campus-sede, funciona como um Laboratório Pedagógico de Ensino, Pesquisa e Extensão para os cursos de licenciatura da instituição, tendo o jogo e as brincadeiras como elementos centrais do desenvolvimento infantil.
Atendendo crianças de 3 a 10 anos, o espaço contempla as comunidades interna e externa. O horário de funcionamento regular é de segunda a sexta-feira, no turno vespertino, das 13h30 às 17h30. No período matutino, o funcionamento depende da programação, que é divulgada previamente.
Entre as atividades desenvolvidas, estão: desenho e pintura (com tinta, lápis de cor e giz de cera); jogos teatrais e de tabuleiro; dança e confecção de brinquedos; contação de histórias e sessões de cinema com pipoca. Durante os eventos, o uso de smartphones é proibido.
Desde 2025, o espaço conta com o projeto de extensão Brincarte, coordenado pela professora Giane Lucélia Grotti, visando desenvolver, no Laboratório da Brinquedoteca, um ambiente de interação e socialização, estimulando habilidades sociais e culturais por meio de atividades lúdicas, e contribuir para o desenvolvimento integral da criança.
O campus Floresta, em Cruzeiro do Sul, também conta com uma brinquedoteca, inaugurada em 2025 e coordenada pela professora Adma de Oliveira Martins, com funcionamento de manhã e à tarde, atendendo crianças de 4 a 11 anos.
Confira mais informações sobre a Brinquedoteca da Ufac
Relacionado
PESQUISE AQUI
MAIS LIDAS
ACRE1 dia agoProaes lança plataforma para cadastro da assistência estudantil — Universidade Federal do Acre
ACRE1 dia agoJosimar Ferreira inicia gestão de 4 anos como reitor da Ufac — Universidade Federal do Acre
ACRE6 dias agoUfac registra fase final de construção do novo CAp no campus-sede — Universidade Federal do Acre
ACRE6 dias agoRevista da gestão de Guida Aquino registra legado de 8 anos — Universidade Federal do Acre
Warning: Undefined variable $user_ID in /home/u824415267/domains/acre.com.br/public_html/wp-content/themes/zox-news/comments.php on line 48
You must be logged in to post a comment Login