NOSSAS REDES

ACRE

Jordan Peterson considering legal action after Trudeau claims he’s funded by Russia

PUBLICADO

em

The Opposition with Dan Knight

And here’s the ultimate shock: Dr. Qiu and Mr. Cheng were not arrested or detained. They were not prosecuted for espionage or national security violations. Instead, under the watchful eye of Justin Trudeau’s government, they were allowed to simply leave.

Imagine for a moment that Canada’s top research lab, handling the most dangerous pathogens in the world—Ebola, Henipah, you name it—was left wide open to foreign actors. Not just any foreign actors, but researchers with direct links to the Chinese Communist Party, its military, and its notorious Thousand Talents Program, which is designed to poach foreign research for China’s own strategic and military gain. It sounds like something out of a bad spy thriller, right? But it’s not fiction; it’s happening in Canada, and no one in Ottawa seemed interested in sounding the alarm.

As detailed in the newly released Interim Report of the Special Committee on the Canada–People’s Republic of China Relationship, titled The Nexus Between Science and National Security in Canada: The Case of the National Microbiology Laboratory in Winnipeg, what we’re seeing is an astonishing lapse in oversight and a clear failure by the Canadian government to protect its own assets. Under the chairmanship of Ken Hardie, this committee has exposed one of the most significant threats to Canada’s national security in recent years. And yet, it’s clear from Ottawa’s inaction that they’re more concerned about diplomacy than defending the integrity of Canada’s scientific research.

Here’s the story: Dr. Xiangguo Qiu and her husband Keding Cheng, both highly placed researchers at Canada’s National Microbiology Laboratory (NML) in Winnipeg, were discovered to have sent live samples of deadly pathogens to the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Yes, you heard that right—the same lab in China where U.S. officials raised concerns about safety standards, the same lab with ties to China’s military bio-defense programs. The duo apparently facilitated the transfer of these dangerous viruses, without ever informing their Canadian superiors of their deep, undisclosed ties to the Chinese Academy of Military Medical Sciences. And instead of acting immediately, Canada’s Public Health Agency dragged its feet for nearly 18 months, leaving these individuals with full access to our country’s most secure lab until they were finally escorted out.

The kicker? Dr. Qiu was not only tied to China’s state-run labs; she was a part of China’s Thousand Talents Program, an initiative infamous for recruiting scientists to advance Chinese military and technological aims abroad. The intelligence community has been ringing the bell on this program for years, pointing out that it’s often used to extract intellectual property and cutting-edge technology from unsuspecting Western institutions. Yet, for years, our own government allowed researchers with links to this very program to operate freely inside our lab, handling the kinds of materials that could cause a pandemic.

So what did Ottawa do in response to all of this? They waited. The government sat on its hands, allowing these researchers to continue their work, their connections to China notwithstanding. When the red flags became impossible to ignore, what did Ottawa do? They spent another year “investigating” before finally revoking their security clearances and escorting them out of the lab. Incredibly, these two were essentially free to operate, with minimal oversight, until they were finally fired. No public condemnation, no mention of betrayal. Just a quiet, bureaucratic exit.

And here’s the ultimate shock: Dr. Qiu and Mr. Cheng were not arrested or detained. They were not prosecuted for espionage or national security violations. Instead, under the watchful eye of Justin Trudeau’s government, they were allowed to simply leave. The RCMP concluded an investigation but chose not to charge them, despite clear evidence of security breaches, undisclosed foreign affiliations, and access to sensitive biological data. Now, these individuals are reportedly back in China, free to use the knowledge they gained at the NML in any way they—or their government—sees fit. This is what happens when national security is treated as an afterthought.

Think about the stakes here. These scientists facilitated the transfer of live, deadly virus samples—Ebola and Henipah, no less—to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, a lab linked to China’s bio-defense ambitions. Had any of these samples been mishandled or compromised during transit, we could have seen an epidemic that would make COVID look like a mild cough. And yet, Ottawa’s response? They let them leave the country, free to take that sensitive information and those deadly pathogens with them.

This isn’t just a case of two rogue scientists. It’s a textbook example of Ottawa’s endless naivety when it comes to China—a government so desperate to avoid rocking the diplomatic boat that it overlooked the most basic principles of national security. And while Canadian leadership dithers, China’s influence operations continue to infiltrate our most secure facilities, capitalizing on our open doors and blind trust. This isn’t about science—it’s about sovereignty. And if Canada’s leaders are too timid to confront the truth about foreign interference, it’s the rest of us who will suffer the consequences.

In any other country, this would have been treated as a scandal of epic proportions. But here in Canada, under Trudeau’s watch, we not only allowed suspected national security threats to operate in a top-level lab, but we gave them the green light to walk away and take their knowledge straight to a foreign power. This report is a wake-up call, but whether Ottawa will finally act to protect Canada’s interests remains to be seen.

The report spells out these security lapses in brutal detail. Not only was cybersecurity alarmingly lax, but access protocols were so outdated that foreign entities had unregulated access to sensitive research and biological materials. This wasn’t just a mishap; this was a failure of leadership on every level, starting at the top. The government’s own Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) had flagged China’s intent to poach scientific research for years. And yet, they ignored that, allowing China, a known aggressor in intellectual property theft, to waltz in and access sensitive data with minimal checks.

Then there’s the espionage risk. It’s clear that China has been targeting Canada’s scientific research for its own military development. This is not speculation; it’s reality. China’s Thousand Talents Program, which the report scrutinizes, is essentially a recruitment and resource-gathering initiative. It encourages Chinese researchers to siphon scientific advancements from abroad and bring them home—not for the betterment of the world, but for China’s military ambitions. The report finally calls this out as a threat, recommending that Canada sever research partnerships with Chinese institutions in high-stakes fields like artificial intelligence, biotechnology, and quantum science.

But here’s the kicker—the recommendations themselves. They make sense, of course. Canada desperately needs to beef up its lab security and stop outsourcing critical research to hostile nations. The report outlines several sensible measures: enhanced security protocols, regular cybersecurity assessments, and yes, a hard stop on partnerships with Chinese research entities in sensitive areas. But what’s troubling is that it took this long and this much incompetence for these ideas to even make it to paper.

Let’s be clear: updating national security policies shouldn’t be a new idea, yet we learn from this report that Canada’s policies haven’t seen a significant update since 2004. Think about that—back then, the world had barely even heard of Facebook. Since then, we’ve entered an era where China has risen as a global tech superpower, yet Ottawa has done next to nothing to adapt. We’re only now beginning to take steps that would have been considered basic precautions a decade ago.

Another recommendation—the establishment of a “List of Trusted Countries”—highlights just how overdue these changes are. The committee suggests that research access should be limited to trusted allies. It’s a painfully obvious measure, but one the government has been too naïve or complacent to enact. We’re talking about limiting sensitive access to allies, not adversaries—a straightforward move that apparently requires a parliamentary committee to remind the government to consider.

So, here’s the good news buried in this report: finally, someone in Ottawa acknowledges that foreign actors, and particularly China, pose a real threat to Canada’s scientific integrity and national security. The recommendations to update policies, bolster security measures, and increase oversight are crucial first steps to protecting Canadian interests. We finally have a report that states the obvious: Canada’s national labs are vulnerable, and it’s about time we stop treating foreign research partners as benign collaborators.

But the real story here isn’t in the recommendations themselves—it’s in what this report reveals about Canada’s persistent, dangerous naivety. The Canadian government allowed this exposure to go on for years, despite clear signs that Chinese actors were exploiting our openness. And the delays! Eighteen months passed between the initial security breach and the firing of these researchers. That delay isn’t just bureaucratic; it’s reckless. The report also conveniently dances around calling China a direct adversary. This soft language is a transparent attempt to avoid upsetting the diplomatic apple cart, even as the Chinese Communist Party plunders Canadian resources right under our noses.

By failing to designate the NML as a facility of national security interest, Ottawa has, in essence, downplayed the real risks tied to foreign interference. This is a lab that deals with viruses capable of sparking pandemics, and yet, our government didn’t even think to prioritize its protection until foreign espionage scandals blew up in public view.

This report is a reality check, but it’s also an indictment. It reveals that Canada’s leaders have been asleep at the wheel while China set its sights on our labs, our technology, and our national interests. Yes, it’s a step forward—but the fact that it took this level of security failure and foreign interference for Ottawa to even begin addressing these issues is a damning testament to their refusal to confront the truth about China.

And here’s the real kicker: nothing in this report guarantees that these recommendations will be enforced. Without the political will to label China as the strategic adversary it is, all of this could end up as little more than lip service. Meanwhile, we had traitors who betrayed Canada, exposing sensitive research to a foreign power—and what did Justin Trudeau do? He let them walk. No charges, no accountability—just a quiet “thanks for coming.” Once again, it will be Canadians—not the bureaucrats in Ottawa—who pay the price for this government’s cowardice.

If Justin Trudeau can’t stand up to China, then it’s time we find a leader who can.

Leia Mais

Advertisement
Comentários

Warning: Undefined variable $user_ID in /home/u824415267/domains/acre.com.br/public_html/wp-content/themes/zox-news/comments.php on line 48

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Comente aqui

ACRE

Ufac recebe deputado Tadeu Hassem e vereadores de Capixaba para tratar de cursos e transporte estudantil — Universidade Federal do Acre

PUBLICADO

em

Ufac recebe deputado Tadeu Hassem e vereadores de Capixaba para tratar de cursos e transporte estudantil.jpg

A reitora da Universidade Federal do Acre (Ufac), Guida Aquino, recebeu, na manhã desta segunda-feira, 18, no gabinete da reitoria, a visita do deputado estadual Tadeu Hassem (Republicanos) e de vereadores do município de Capixaba. A pauta do encontro envolveu a possibilidade de oferta de cursos de graduação no município e apoio ao transporte de estudantes daquele município que frequentam a instituição em Rio Branco.

A reitora Guida Aquino destacou que a interiorização do ensino superior é um compromisso da universidade, mas depende de emendas parlamentares para custeio e viabilização dos cursos. “O meu partido é a educação, e a universidade tem sido o caminho de transformação para jovens do interior. É por meio de parcerias e recursos destinados por parlamentares que conseguimos levar cursos fora da sede. Precisamos estar juntos para garantir essas oportunidades”, afirmou.

Atualmente, 32 alunos de Capixaba estudam na Ufac. A demanda apresentada pelos parlamentares inclui parcerias com o governo estadual para garantir transporte adequado, além da implantação de cursos a distância por meio do polo da Universidade Aberta do Brasil (UAB), em parceria com a prefeitura.

O deputado Tadeu Hassem reforçou o pedido de apoio e colocou seu mandato à disposição para buscar soluções junto ao governo estadual. “Estamos tratando de um tema fundamental para Capixaba. Queremos viabilizar transporte aos estudantes e também novas possibilidades de cursos, seja de forma presencial ou a distância. Esse é um compromisso que assumimos com a população”, declarou.

A vereadora Dra. Ângela Paula (PL) ressaltou a transformação pessoal que viveu ao ingressar na universidade e defendeu a importância de ampliar esse acesso para jovens de Capixaba. “A universidade mudou minha vida e pode mudar a vida de muitas outras pessoas. Hoje, nossos alunos têm dificuldades para se deslocar e muitos desistem do sonho. Precisamos de sensibilidade para garantir oportunidades de estudo também no nosso município”, disse.

Também participaram da reunião a pró-reitora de Graduação, Ednaceli Abreu Damasceno; o presidente da Câmara Municipal de Capixaba, Diego Paulista (PP); e o advogado Amós D’Ávila de Paulo, representante legal do Legislativo municipal.



Leia Mais: UFAC

Continue lendo

ACRE

Professora da Ufac é nomeada membro afiliada da ABC — Universidade Federal do Acre

PUBLICADO

em

Professora da Ufac é nomeada membro afiliada da ABC.jpg

A professora da Ufac, Simone Reis, foi nomeada membro afiliada da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (ABC) na terça-feira (5), em cerimônia realizada na Universidade Federal do Oeste do Pará (Ufopa), em Santarém (PA). A escolha reconhece sua trajetória acadêmica e a pesquisa de pós-doutorado desenvolvida na Universidade de Oxford, na Inglaterra, com foco em biodiversidade, ecologia e conservação.

A ABC busca estimular a continuidade do trabalho científico de seus membros, promover a pesquisa nacional e difundir a ciência. Todos os anos, cinco jovens cientistas são indicados e eleitos por membros titulares para integrar a categoria de membros afiliados, criada em 2007 para reconhecer e incentivar novos talentos na ciência brasileira.
“Nunca imaginei estar nesse time e fiquei muito surpresa por isso. Espero contribuir com pesquisas científicas, parcerias internacionais e discussões ecológicas junto à ABC”, disse a professora Simone Reis.



Leia Mais: UFAC

Continue lendo

ACRE

Reitora assina contrato de digitalização de acervo acadêmico — Universidade Federal do Acre

PUBLICADO

em

Reitora assina contrato de digitalização de acervo acadêmico.jpg

A reitora da Ufac, Guida Aquino, assinou o contrato de digitalização do acervo de documentos acadêmicos. A ação ocorreu na tarde de quarta-feira, 13, no hall do Núcleo de Registro e Controle Acadêmico (Nurca). A empresa responsável pelo serviço é a SOS Tecnologia e Gestão da Informação.

O processo atende à Portaria do MEC nº 360, de 18 de maio de 2022, que obriga instituições federais de ensino a converterem o acervo acadêmico para o meio digital. A medida busca garantir segurança, organização e acesso facilitado às informações, além de preservar documentos físicos de valor histórico e acadêmico.

Para a reitora Guida Aquino, a ação reforça o compromisso institucional com a memória da comunidade acadêmica. “É de extrema importância arquivar a história da nossa querida universidade”, afirmou.

A decisão foi discutida e aprovada pelo Comitê Gestor do Acervo Acadêmico da Ufac, em reunião realizada no dia 7 de julho de 2022. Agora, a meta é mensurar o tamanho dos arquivos do Nurca para dar continuidade ao processo, assegurando que toda a documentação esteja em conformidade legal e disponível em formato digital.



Leia Mais: UFAC

Continue lendo

MAIS LIDAS