NOSSAS REDES

ACRE

Xiaomi 14T vs. 14T Pro

PUBLICADO

em

You are in the market for an upper-midrange phone or just a solid all-rounder, and you are boujnd to find this year’s Xiaomi 14T Series enticing. But it’s hard to tell the Xiaomi 14T and the Xiaomi 14T Pro apart, which makes it even harder to decide which one to get.

And yet, the 14T Pro asks for a serious price premium over the vanilla 14T. At the time of writing, the price difference is around €150-200. A non-trivial difference, we’d say. So let’s see what it has to offer on top of the already excellent Xiaomi 14T.

Table of Contents:

For starters, you can compare the complete specs sheets or directly continue with our editor’s assessment in the following text.

The spec sheets alone can’t tell the whole story, so let’s take a deeper dive and see what’s beneath the surface.

Size comparison


Xiaomi
14T

193 g


160.5 x 75.1 x 7.8 mm
(6.32 x 2.96 x 0.31 in)

Size-wise, the 14T and 14T Pro are basically twins. They’ve got the same screen diagonal, height and width. The vanilla 14T is ever so slightly thinner, probably due to it missing a wireless charging coil, but it is more than ten grams lighter.


Xiaomi 14T vs. Xiaomi 14T Pro

The difference in weight could probably be mainly attributed to the fact that the 14T Pro has an aluminum frame, whereas the 14T settles for an all-plastic one.

Still, that doesn’t mean the 14T feels cheap. Both devices have very nice builds and the matte glass-like surface on the standard 14T is pretty nice to touch. Some may even find the boxy frame with straight sides more appealing and providing a more secure grip.

Display comparison

Xiaomi 14T

Xiaomi
14T

6.67″


AMOLED
144Hz


1220×2712
pixels


446
ppi

The 14T and 14T Pro share the same display – 6.67-inch with all the bells and whistles like HDR10+ support, 16-bit color depth and 144Hz refresh rate.

The tests show it too. Both panels reach 1,200-1,300 nits, ensuring a comfortable viewing experience outdoors.

Battery life

When it comes to battery life, the 14T Pro is the clear winner here, although not by much. The 14T Pro consistently beats the 14T in all tests except in the 4G call scenario, but it only edges out its cheaper sibling. Nevertheless, going for the 14T Pro will likely give you some extra runtime regardless of whether you are web browsing, gaming or watching streaming videos.

Since the two devices run on the same HyperOS software and share the same battery and display, this leaves the Dimensity 9300+ SoC as the only variable adding some extra hours to the battery endurance.

Charging speed

Charging is one of the reasons you might want to shell out some extra money for the 14T Pro. It supports Xiaomi’s proprietary 120-watt fast charging standard, while the 14T proper settles for 67W. Unfortunately, neither retail box provides the appropriate charger, so you will have to buy those separately.

Making use of the maximum 120W charging capability will reward you with full charge in merely 23. That’s blazing-fast and significantly outpaces the 14T with its 67W.

Furthermore, only the 14T Pro supports 50W wireless fast charging with Xiaomi’s proprietary wireless charging stand. Another reason to get the 14T Pro.

Speaker test

Looking at the results from the speaker test alone, we can conclude that the 14T has somewhat better speakers. They are slightly louder while having similar frequency response curve.

Subjectively speaking, some may find the 14T Pro’s speakers nicer as it has a bit fuller, warmer sound with more pronounced bass. That doesn’t mean the 14T has no bass, but the boost in the highs results in more pronounced vocals and toned-down lows.

Performance

CPU performance is the other reason you might want to opt for the 14T Pro. It runs on a more powerful, flagship MediaTek chipset – the Dimensity 9300+ chipset compared to the Dimensity 8300 Ultra inside the 14T.

The Dimensity 9300+ graphics chip is also considerably more powerful. The benchmark results are here to attest.

Xiaomi 14T

Xiaomi
14T


Dimensity 8300 Ultra
4 nm


256GB 12GB RAM
base config

There’s no difference in the memory configurations. Both devices offer the same memory options, while the storage chips are both UFS 4.0. The only difference is that the Pro has one extra configuration with 1TB storage and 12GB of RAM if you really want to splurge.

Benchmark performance

Xiaomi 14T

Xiaomi
14T


AnTuTu 10
1,334,481


Geekbench 6
4,333


3D Mark
10,791

The performance difference between the 14T and 14T Pro is huge and the Pro outperforms its sibling by as much as 77% in multi-threaded CPU tasks (Geekbench 6) and is 60% better in its overall performance when combining CPU, GPU, memory and storage (AnTuTu 10). The graphics-heavy 3DMark Wild Life benchmark shows that the 14T Pro’s GPU is 33% faster.

This performance gap is hard to ignore, especially by users looking for a more powerful device.

Camera comparison

The Xiaomi 14T and 14T Pro share largely similar camera hardware, but there are a few differences to keep in mind. For instance, the 50MP f/1.7 camera on the 14T uses a smaller 1/1.56″ sensor, while the Pro gets a 50MP 1/1.31″ sensor paired with f/1.6 aperture. In theory, the 14T Pro should produce slightly better photos, but in reality, the difference is rather negligible.

The zoom cameras are also different. The 14T proper gets a 50MP unit with 2x optical zoom, while the 14T Pro extends that to 2.6x. The ultrawide and the selfie cameras are all identical – 12MP f/2.2 ultrawide and 32MP f/2.0 selfie shooter.

Image quality

Photo quality-wise, the differences are even smaller. The ultrawide cameras achieve identical results during the day and at night and we can say the same for the main camera too.

The 14T Pro has a slight advantage during the day with slightly crispier pictures, resolving finer detail but you have to look closely to find the difference. It can be seen mostly in the foliage and fine-detail building facades. It’s even hardware to spot the difference at night.


Xiaomi 14T: 0.6x
Xiaomi 14T: 1x
Xiaomi 14T: 2x
Xiaomi 14T: 4x

Xiaomi 14T: 0.6x • 1x • 2x • 4x


Xiaomi 14T Pro: 0.6x
Xiaomi 14T Pro: 1x
Xiaomi 14T Pro: 2x
Xiaomi 14T Pro: 2.6x
Xiaomi 14T Pro: 5x

Xiaomi 14T Pro: 0.6x • 1x • 2x • 2.6x • 5x

The 14T’s 2x zoom camera has a small advantage over the 2x zoom crop from the 14T Pro.

But the 2.6x zoom camera on the 14T Pro is really sharp, offering superior image quality in daylight and about the same in low-light.

Both phones perform equally well in their respective 4x and 5x zoom modes too even if they are digital zooms.


Xiaomi 14T: 0.6x
Xiaomi 14T: 1x
Xiaomi 14T: 2x
Xiaomi 14T: 4x

Xiaomi 14T: 0.6x • 1x • 2x • 4x


Xiaomi 14T Pro: 0.6x
Xiaomi 14T Pro: 1x
Xiaomi 14T Pro: 2x
Xiaomi 14T Pro: 2.6x
Xiaomi 14T Pro: 5x

Xiaomi 14T Pro: 0.6x • 1x • 2x • 2.6x • 5x

Video quality

In the video department, the two devices trade blows. While 14T and 14T Pro produce similarly-looking videos with their ultrawide and main cameras, the 14T’s 2x zoom camera offers considerably better zoom video. It’s just noticeably sharper.

Below we have a few framegrabs from the videos taken by the two phones at each focal length so it’s easier to compare to one another.


Xiaomi 14T: 0.6x
Xiaomi 14T: 1x
Xiaomi 14T: 2x
Xiaomi 14T: 1x

Xiaomi 14T: 0.6x • 1x • 2x • 1x


Xiaomi 14T Pro: 0.6x
Xiaomi 14T Pro: 1x
Xiaomi 14T Pro: 2.6x
Xiaomi 14T Pro: 1x

Xiaomi 14T Pro: 0.6x • 1x • 2.6x • 1x

One could make an argument that the 14T Pro’s main and ultrawide cameras produce slightly sharper videos with more accurate color temperature, but you have to look really close to spot the difference. Moreover, some may like the 14T’s slightly warmer and cozy-looking video rendering.

However, the nighttime capabilities of the 14T Pro are sensibly better. The video sample we took has a wider dynamic range, is sharper, is less noisy, and has better contrast and more accurate colors.

Verdict

Going only by the specs sheet, the 14T Pro looks to be the less practical choice. Even after exploring the nuances further, one could make a case that the Xiaomi 14T is good enough and will get you more than halfway there for a lot less. The two devices are around €150-200 apart, after all.

On the other hand, the 14T Pro will justify the price difference for users looking for better performance and faster charging. This is where the 14T Pro pulls ahead of the 14T and edges it out in our battery endurance tests and camera comparison.

There’s no easy answer to the dilemma for most of you, so weigh your priorities and decide if the 14T Pro is worth the price premium depending on whether you value the extra features it provides.


    Xiaomi 14T

    Get the Xiaomi 14T for:

  • The considerably lower price tag.
  • The better zoom videos.
  • The boxier design.

    Xiaomi 14T Pro

    Get the Xiaomi 14T Pro for:

  • The slightly longer battery life.
  • The tougher build.
  • The much faster charging.
  • The much higher performance.
  • The better overall camera experience.

Leia Mais

Advertisement
Comentários

Warning: Undefined variable $user_ID in /home/u824415267/domains/acre.com.br/public_html/wp-content/themes/zox-news/comments.php on line 48

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Comente aqui

ACRE

Nota da Andifes sobre os cortes no orçamento aprovado pelo Congresso Nacional para as Universidades Federais — Universidade Federal do Acre

PUBLICADO

em

andifes-nota.jpg

Notícias


publicado:
23/12/2025 07h31,


última modificação:
23/12/2025 07h32

Confira a nota na integra no link: Nota Andifes



Leia Mais: UFAC

Continue lendo

ACRE

Ufac entrega equipamentos ao Centro de Referência Paralímpico — Universidade Federal do Acre

PUBLICADO

em

Ufac entrega equipamentos ao Centro de Referência Paralímpico — Universidade Federal do Acre

A Ufac, a Associação Paradesportiva Acreana (APA) e a Secretaria Extraordinária de Esporte e Lazer realizaram, nessa quarta-feira, 17, a entrega dos equipamentos de halterofilismo e musculação no Centro de Referência Paralímpico, localizado no bloco de Educação Física, campus-sede. A iniciativa fortalece as ações voltadas ao esporte paraolímpico e amplia as condições de treinamento e preparação dos atletas atendidos pelo centro, contribuindo para o desenvolvimento esportivo e a inclusão de pessoas com deficiência.

Os equipamentos foram adquiridos por meio de emenda parlamentar do deputado estadual Eduardo Ribeiro (PSD), em parceria com o Comitê Paralímpico Brasileiro, com o objetivo de fortalecer a preparação esportiva e garantir melhores condições de treino aos atletas do Centro de Referência Paralímpico da Ufac.

Durante a solenidade, a reitora da Ufac, Guida Aquino, destacou a importância da atuação conjunta entre as instituições. “Sozinho não fazemos nada, mas juntos somos mais fortes. É por isso que esse centro está dando certo.”

A presidente da APA, Rakel Thompson Abud, relembrou a trajetória de construção do projeto. “Estamos dentro da Ufac realizando esse trabalho há muitos anos e hoje vemos esse resultado, que é o Centro de Referência Paralímpico.”

O coordenador do centro e do curso de Educação Física, Jader Bezerra, ressaltou o compromisso das instituições envolvidas. “Este momento é de agradecimento. Tudo o que fizemos é em prol dessa comunidade. Agradeço a todas as instituições envolvidas e reforço que estaremos sempre aqui para receber os atletas com a melhor estrutura possível.”

O atleta paralímpico Mazinho Silva, representando os demais atletas, agradeceu o apoio recebido. “Hoje é um momento de gratidão a todos os envolvidos. Precisamos avançar cada vez mais e somos muito gratos por tudo o que está sendo feito.”

A vice-governadora do Estado do Acre, Mailza Assis da Silva, também destacou o trabalho desenvolvido no centro e o talento dos atletas. “Estou reconhecendo o excelente trabalho de toda a equipe, mas, acima de tudo, o talento de cada um de nossos atletas.”

Já o assessor do deputado estadual Eduardo Ribeiro, Jeferson Barroso, enfatizou a finalidade social da emenda. “O deputado Eduardo fica muito feliz em ver que o recurso está sendo bem gerenciado, garantindo direitos, igualdade e representatividade.”

Também compuseram o dispositivo de honra a pró-reitora de Inovação, Almecina Balbino, e um dos coordenadores do Centro de Referência Paralímpico, Antônio Clodoaldo Melo de Castro.

(Camila Barbosa, estagiária Ascom/Ufac)



Leia Mais: UFAC

Continue lendo

ACRE

Orquestra de Câmara da Ufac apresenta-se no campus-sede — Universidade Federal do Acre

PUBLICADO

em

Orquestra de Câmara da Ufac apresenta-se no campus-sede — Universidade Federal do Acre

A Orquestra de Câmara da Ufac realizou, nesta quarta-feira, 17, uma apresentação musical no auditório do E-Amazônia, no campus-sede. Sob a coordenação e regência do professor Romualdo Medeiros, o concerto integrou a programação cultural da instituição e evidenciou a importância da música instrumental na formação artística, cultural e acadêmica da comunidade universitária.

 

A reitora Guida Aquino ressaltou a relevância da iniciativa. “Fico encantada. A cultura e a arte são fundamentais para a nossa universidade.” Durante o evento, o pró-reitor de Extensão e Cultura, Carlos Paula de Moraes, destacou o papel social da arte. “Sem arte, sem cultura e sem música, a sociedade sofre mais. A arte, a cultura e a música são direitos humanos.” 

Também compôs o dispositivo de honra a professora Lya Januária Vasconcelos.

(Camila Barbosa, estagiária Ascom/Ufac)

 



Leia Mais: UFAC

Continue lendo

MAIS LIDAS