NOSSAS REDES

ACRE

Jordan Peterson considering legal action after Trudeau claims he’s funded by Russia

PUBLICADO

em

The Opposition with Dan Knight

And here’s the ultimate shock: Dr. Qiu and Mr. Cheng were not arrested or detained. They were not prosecuted for espionage or national security violations. Instead, under the watchful eye of Justin Trudeau’s government, they were allowed to simply leave.

Imagine for a moment that Canada’s top research lab, handling the most dangerous pathogens in the world—Ebola, Henipah, you name it—was left wide open to foreign actors. Not just any foreign actors, but researchers with direct links to the Chinese Communist Party, its military, and its notorious Thousand Talents Program, which is designed to poach foreign research for China’s own strategic and military gain. It sounds like something out of a bad spy thriller, right? But it’s not fiction; it’s happening in Canada, and no one in Ottawa seemed interested in sounding the alarm.

As detailed in the newly released Interim Report of the Special Committee on the Canada–People’s Republic of China Relationship, titled The Nexus Between Science and National Security in Canada: The Case of the National Microbiology Laboratory in Winnipeg, what we’re seeing is an astonishing lapse in oversight and a clear failure by the Canadian government to protect its own assets. Under the chairmanship of Ken Hardie, this committee has exposed one of the most significant threats to Canada’s national security in recent years. And yet, it’s clear from Ottawa’s inaction that they’re more concerned about diplomacy than defending the integrity of Canada’s scientific research.

Here’s the story: Dr. Xiangguo Qiu and her husband Keding Cheng, both highly placed researchers at Canada’s National Microbiology Laboratory (NML) in Winnipeg, were discovered to have sent live samples of deadly pathogens to the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Yes, you heard that right—the same lab in China where U.S. officials raised concerns about safety standards, the same lab with ties to China’s military bio-defense programs. The duo apparently facilitated the transfer of these dangerous viruses, without ever informing their Canadian superiors of their deep, undisclosed ties to the Chinese Academy of Military Medical Sciences. And instead of acting immediately, Canada’s Public Health Agency dragged its feet for nearly 18 months, leaving these individuals with full access to our country’s most secure lab until they were finally escorted out.

The kicker? Dr. Qiu was not only tied to China’s state-run labs; she was a part of China’s Thousand Talents Program, an initiative infamous for recruiting scientists to advance Chinese military and technological aims abroad. The intelligence community has been ringing the bell on this program for years, pointing out that it’s often used to extract intellectual property and cutting-edge technology from unsuspecting Western institutions. Yet, for years, our own government allowed researchers with links to this very program to operate freely inside our lab, handling the kinds of materials that could cause a pandemic.

So what did Ottawa do in response to all of this? They waited. The government sat on its hands, allowing these researchers to continue their work, their connections to China notwithstanding. When the red flags became impossible to ignore, what did Ottawa do? They spent another year “investigating” before finally revoking their security clearances and escorting them out of the lab. Incredibly, these two were essentially free to operate, with minimal oversight, until they were finally fired. No public condemnation, no mention of betrayal. Just a quiet, bureaucratic exit.

And here’s the ultimate shock: Dr. Qiu and Mr. Cheng were not arrested or detained. They were not prosecuted for espionage or national security violations. Instead, under the watchful eye of Justin Trudeau’s government, they were allowed to simply leave. The RCMP concluded an investigation but chose not to charge them, despite clear evidence of security breaches, undisclosed foreign affiliations, and access to sensitive biological data. Now, these individuals are reportedly back in China, free to use the knowledge they gained at the NML in any way they—or their government—sees fit. This is what happens when national security is treated as an afterthought.

Think about the stakes here. These scientists facilitated the transfer of live, deadly virus samples—Ebola and Henipah, no less—to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, a lab linked to China’s bio-defense ambitions. Had any of these samples been mishandled or compromised during transit, we could have seen an epidemic that would make COVID look like a mild cough. And yet, Ottawa’s response? They let them leave the country, free to take that sensitive information and those deadly pathogens with them.

This isn’t just a case of two rogue scientists. It’s a textbook example of Ottawa’s endless naivety when it comes to China—a government so desperate to avoid rocking the diplomatic boat that it overlooked the most basic principles of national security. And while Canadian leadership dithers, China’s influence operations continue to infiltrate our most secure facilities, capitalizing on our open doors and blind trust. This isn’t about science—it’s about sovereignty. And if Canada’s leaders are too timid to confront the truth about foreign interference, it’s the rest of us who will suffer the consequences.

In any other country, this would have been treated as a scandal of epic proportions. But here in Canada, under Trudeau’s watch, we not only allowed suspected national security threats to operate in a top-level lab, but we gave them the green light to walk away and take their knowledge straight to a foreign power. This report is a wake-up call, but whether Ottawa will finally act to protect Canada’s interests remains to be seen.

The report spells out these security lapses in brutal detail. Not only was cybersecurity alarmingly lax, but access protocols were so outdated that foreign entities had unregulated access to sensitive research and biological materials. This wasn’t just a mishap; this was a failure of leadership on every level, starting at the top. The government’s own Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) had flagged China’s intent to poach scientific research for years. And yet, they ignored that, allowing China, a known aggressor in intellectual property theft, to waltz in and access sensitive data with minimal checks.

Then there’s the espionage risk. It’s clear that China has been targeting Canada’s scientific research for its own military development. This is not speculation; it’s reality. China’s Thousand Talents Program, which the report scrutinizes, is essentially a recruitment and resource-gathering initiative. It encourages Chinese researchers to siphon scientific advancements from abroad and bring them home—not for the betterment of the world, but for China’s military ambitions. The report finally calls this out as a threat, recommending that Canada sever research partnerships with Chinese institutions in high-stakes fields like artificial intelligence, biotechnology, and quantum science.

But here’s the kicker—the recommendations themselves. They make sense, of course. Canada desperately needs to beef up its lab security and stop outsourcing critical research to hostile nations. The report outlines several sensible measures: enhanced security protocols, regular cybersecurity assessments, and yes, a hard stop on partnerships with Chinese research entities in sensitive areas. But what’s troubling is that it took this long and this much incompetence for these ideas to even make it to paper.

Let’s be clear: updating national security policies shouldn’t be a new idea, yet we learn from this report that Canada’s policies haven’t seen a significant update since 2004. Think about that—back then, the world had barely even heard of Facebook. Since then, we’ve entered an era where China has risen as a global tech superpower, yet Ottawa has done next to nothing to adapt. We’re only now beginning to take steps that would have been considered basic precautions a decade ago.

Another recommendation—the establishment of a “List of Trusted Countries”—highlights just how overdue these changes are. The committee suggests that research access should be limited to trusted allies. It’s a painfully obvious measure, but one the government has been too naïve or complacent to enact. We’re talking about limiting sensitive access to allies, not adversaries—a straightforward move that apparently requires a parliamentary committee to remind the government to consider.

So, here’s the good news buried in this report: finally, someone in Ottawa acknowledges that foreign actors, and particularly China, pose a real threat to Canada’s scientific integrity and national security. The recommendations to update policies, bolster security measures, and increase oversight are crucial first steps to protecting Canadian interests. We finally have a report that states the obvious: Canada’s national labs are vulnerable, and it’s about time we stop treating foreign research partners as benign collaborators.

But the real story here isn’t in the recommendations themselves—it’s in what this report reveals about Canada’s persistent, dangerous naivety. The Canadian government allowed this exposure to go on for years, despite clear signs that Chinese actors were exploiting our openness. And the delays! Eighteen months passed between the initial security breach and the firing of these researchers. That delay isn’t just bureaucratic; it’s reckless. The report also conveniently dances around calling China a direct adversary. This soft language is a transparent attempt to avoid upsetting the diplomatic apple cart, even as the Chinese Communist Party plunders Canadian resources right under our noses.

By failing to designate the NML as a facility of national security interest, Ottawa has, in essence, downplayed the real risks tied to foreign interference. This is a lab that deals with viruses capable of sparking pandemics, and yet, our government didn’t even think to prioritize its protection until foreign espionage scandals blew up in public view.

This report is a reality check, but it’s also an indictment. It reveals that Canada’s leaders have been asleep at the wheel while China set its sights on our labs, our technology, and our national interests. Yes, it’s a step forward—but the fact that it took this level of security failure and foreign interference for Ottawa to even begin addressing these issues is a damning testament to their refusal to confront the truth about China.

And here’s the real kicker: nothing in this report guarantees that these recommendations will be enforced. Without the political will to label China as the strategic adversary it is, all of this could end up as little more than lip service. Meanwhile, we had traitors who betrayed Canada, exposing sensitive research to a foreign power—and what did Justin Trudeau do? He let them walk. No charges, no accountability—just a quiet “thanks for coming.” Once again, it will be Canadians—not the bureaucrats in Ottawa—who pay the price for this government’s cowardice.

If Justin Trudeau can’t stand up to China, then it’s time we find a leader who can.

Leia Mais

Advertisement
Comentários

Warning: Undefined variable $user_ID in /home/u824415267/domains/acre.com.br/public_html/wp-content/themes/zox-news/comments.php on line 48

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Comente aqui

ACRE

Professora publica livro sobre sítios naturais sagrados do povo Nukini — Universidade Federal do Acre

PUBLICADO

em

Professora publica livro sobre sítios naturais sagrados do povo Nukini — Universidade Federal do Acre

A professora Renata Duarte de O. Freitas, do curso de Direito do campus Floresta da Ufac, lança o livro “Aldeia Isã Vakevu, do Povo Originário Nukini: Um Sítio Natural Sagrado no Coração do Juruá” (Lumen Juris, 240 p.). O evento ocorre neste sábado, 7, às 19h, no teatro dos Nauas, em Cruzeiro do Sul. Resultado de investigação científica, a obra integra a cosmologia indígena aos marcos regulatórios da justiça ambiental.

A pesquisa é fundamentada na trajetória de resistência do povo Nukini. O livro presta homenagem à memória de Arlete Muniz (Ynesto Kumã), matriarca, parteira e liderança espiritual que preservou os conhecimentos milenares do Povo da Onça frente aos processos de aculturação e violência histórica.

O texto destaca a continuidade desse patrimônio imaterial, transmitido de geração para geração ao seu neto, o líder espiritual Txane Pistyani Nukini (Leonardo Muniz). Atualmente, esse legado sustenta a governança espiritual no Kupixawa Huhu Inesto, onde a aplicação das medicinas da floresta e a proteção territorial dialogam com a escrita acadêmica para materializar a visão de mundo Nukini perante a sociedade global.

Renata Duarte de O. Freitas introduz no cenário jurídico eixos teóricos que propõem um novo paradigma para a conservação ambiental: sítios naturais sagrados, que são locais de identidade cultural e espiritual; direito achado na aldeia, cuja proposta é que o ordenamento jurídico reconheça que a lei também emana da sacralidade desses locais; e direitos bioculturais, que demonstram que a biodiversidade da Serra do Divisor é preservada porque está ligada ao respeito pelos sítios naturais sagrados.

Ao analisar a sobreposição de uma parte do território Nukini com o Parque Nacional da Serra do Divisor, a obra oferece uma solução científica: o reconhecimento de que áreas protegidas pelo Estado devem ser geridas em conjunto com os povos originários, respeitando seus territórios sagrados.

 



Leia Mais: UFAC

Continue lendo

ACRE

Em caravana, ministro da Educação, Camilo Santana, visita a Ufac — Universidade Federal do Acre

PUBLICADO

em

Em caravana, ministro da Educação, Camilo Santana, visita a Ufac — Universidade Federal do Acre

A Ufac recebeu, nesta quarta-feira, 25, na Reitoria, campus-sede, a visita do ministro da Educação, Camilo Santana, no âmbito da caravana Aqui Tem MEC, iniciativa do Ministério da Educação voltada ao acompanhamento de ações e investimentos nas instituições federais de ensino.

Durante a agenda, o ministro destacou que a caravana tem percorrido instituições federais em diferentes Estados para conhecer a realidade de cada campus, dialogar com gestores e a comunidade acadêmica, além de acompanhar as demandas da educação pública federal.

Ao tratar dos investimentos relacionados à Ufac, a reitora Guida Aquino destacou a obra do campus Fronteira, em Brasileia, que conta com R$ 40 milhões em recursos do Novo Programa de Aceleração do Crescimento (PAC). A estrutura terá seis cursos, com salas de aula, laboratórios, restaurante universitário e biblioteca.

Abordando a visita, Guida ressaltou a importância da universidade para o Estado e a missão da educação pública. “A Ufac é a única universidade pública federal de ensino superior do Acre e, por isso, tem papel estratégico na formação e no desenvolvimento regional. A educação é que transforma vidas, transforma o país.”

Outro tema tratado durante a agenda foi a implantação do Hospital Universitário no Acre. Camilo Santana afirmou que o Estado é o único que ainda não conta com essa estrutura e informou que o governo federal dispõe de R$ 50 milhões, por meio do Novo PAC, para viabilizar adequações e a implantação da unidade.

Ele explicou que a prioridade continua sendo a concretização de uma parceria para doação de um hospital, mas afirmou que, se isso não ocorrer, o MEC buscará outra alternativa para garantir a instalação do serviço no Estado. “O importante é que nenhum Estado desse país deixe de ter um hospital universitário”, enfatizou.

Guida reforçou a importância do projeto e disse que o Hospital Universitário já poderia ser celebrado no Acre. Ao defender a iniciativa, contou que a unidade contribuiria para qualificar o atendimento, reduzir filas de tratamento fora de domicílio e atender melhor pacientes do interior, inclusive em casos ligados às doenças tropicais da Amazônia. Em tom crítico, declarou: “O cavalo selado, ele só passa uma vez”, ao se referir à oportunidade de implantação do hospital.

Após coletiva de imprensa, o ministro participou de reunião fechada com pró-reitores, gestores, políticos e parlamentares da bancada federal acreana, entre eles o senador Sérgio Petecão (PSD) e as deputadas Meire Serafim (União) e Socorro Neri (PP).

A comitiva do MEC foi formada pela secretária de Educação Básica, Kátia Schweickardt; pelo secretário de Educação Profissional e Tecnológica, Marcelo Bregagnoli; pelo secretário de Educação Superior, Marcus Vinicius David; e pelo presidente da Empresa Brasileira de Serviços Hospitalares, Arthur Chioro.

Laboratório de Paleontologia

Depois de participar de reunião, Camilo Santana visitou o Laboratório de Paleontologia da Ufac. O professor Edson Guilherme, coordenador do espaço, apresentou o acervo científico ao ministro e destacou a importância da estrutura para o avanço das pesquisas no Acre. O laboratório foi reformulado, ampliado e recentemente reinaugurado.

Aberto para visitação de segunda a sexta-feira, em horário de expediente, exceto feriados, o local reúne fósseis originais e réplicas de animais que viveram no período do Mioceno, quando o oeste amazônico era dominado por grandes sistemas de rios e lagos. A entrada é gratuita e a visitação é aberta a estudantes e à comunidade em geral.

 



Leia Mais: UFAC

Continue lendo

ACRE

A PROGRAD — Universidade Federal do Acre

PUBLICADO

em

pro_reitora_graduacao.png

A Pró‑Reitoria de Graduação (Prograd) da Universidade Federal do Acre (Ufac) é o órgão responsável pelo planejamento, coordenação e supervisão das atividades acadêmicas relacionadas ao ensino de graduação. Sua atuação está centrada em fortalecer a formação universitária, promovendo políticas e diretrizes que assegurem a qualidade, a integração pedagógica e o desenvolvimento dos cursos de bacharelado, licenciatura e demais formações presenciais e a distância. A Prograd articula ações com as unidades acadêmicas, órgãos colegiados e a comunidade universitária, garantindo que os currículos e práticas pedagógicas estejam alinhados aos objetivos institucionais.

Entre as principais atribuições da Prograd estão a coordenação da política de ensino, a supervisão de programas de bolsas voltadas à graduação, a análise e encaminhamento de propostas normativas e a participação em iniciativas que promovem a reflexão e o diálogo sobre o ensino superior.

A Prograd é organizada em três diretorias, cada uma com funções específicas e complementares:

Diretoria de Apoio ao Desenvolvimento do Ensino — responsável por ações estratégicas voltadas ao desenvolvimento de metodologias, à regulação e ao apoio pedagógico dos cursos de graduação.

Diretoria de Apoio à Formação Acadêmica — dedicada a acompanhar e apoiar as atividades acadêmicas dos estudantes, incluindo estágios, mobilidade estudantil e acompanhamento da formação acadêmica.

Diretoria de Apoio à Interiorização e Programas Especiais — voltada à gestão de programas especiais, políticas de interiorização e ações que ampliam o acesso e a permanência dos alunos em diferentes regiões.

A Prograd participa, ainda, de iniciativas que promovem a reflexão e o diálogo sobre o ensino superior, integrando docentes, estudantes e gestores em fóruns, encontros e ações que visam à atualização contínua dos processos formativos e ao atendimento das demandas sociais contemporâneas.

Com compromisso institucional, a Pró‑Reitoria de Graduação contribui para que a UFAC cumpra seu papel educativo, formando profissionais críticos e comprometidos com as realidades local e regional, garantindo um ambiente acadêmico de excelência e responsabilidade social.

Ednacelí Abreu Damasceno
Pró-Reitora de Graduação



Leia Mais: UFAC

Continue lendo

MAIS LIDAS